The concept of soundscapes according to ISO 12913-1/-2/-3 proposes a descriptive framework based on a triangulation between the entities acoustic environment, person and context. While research on the person-related dimensions is well established, there is not yet complete agreement on the relevant indicators and dimensions for the pure description of acoustic environments. Therefore, this work attempts to identify acoustic dimensions that actually vary between different acoustic environments and thus can be used to characterize them. To this end, an exploratory, data-based approach was taken. A database of Ambisonics soundscape recordings (approx. 12.5 h) was first analyzed using a variety of signal-based acoustic indicators (Ni = 326) within the categories loudness, quality, spaciousness and time. Multivariate statistical methods were then applied to identify compound and interpretable acoustic dimensions. The interpretation of the results reveals 8 independent dimensions â Loudnessâ , â Directivityâ , â Timbreâ , â High-Frequency Timbreâ , â Dynamic Rangeâ , â High-Frequency Amplitude Modulationâ , â Loudness Progressionâ and â Mid-High-Frequency Amplitude Modulationâ to be statistically relevant. These derived latent acoustic dimensions explain 48.76% of the observed total variance and form a physical basis for the description of acoustic environments. Although all baseline indicators were selected for perceptual reasons, validation must be done through appropriate listening tests in future.
|