A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end mills

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/10992
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/11074
dc.contributor.author Dröder, Klaus
dc.contributor.author Karpuschewski, Bernhard
dc.contributor.author Uhlmann, Eckart
dc.contributor.author Arrabiyeh, Peter A.
dc.contributor.author Berger, Daniel
dc.contributor.author Busemann, Sarah
dc.contributor.author Hartig, Jörg
dc.contributor.author Madanchi, Nadine
dc.contributor.author Mahlfeld, Georg
dc.contributor.author Sommerfeld, Christian
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-25T11:49:21Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-25T11:49:21Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.citation Dröder, K.; Karpuschewski, B.; Uhlmann, E.; Arrabiyeh, P.A.; Berger, D. et al.: A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end mills. In: Production Engineering 14 (2020), Nr. 3, S. 355-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-020-00966-9
dc.description.abstract Milling of ferrous metals is usually performed by applying cemented carbide tools due to their high hardness, temperature and wear resistance. Recently, ceramic tool materials have been on the rise and enhanced the efficiency in machining. As ceramics are brittle-hard materials, tool manufacturing requires a sound knowledge in order to meet the tool requirements such as sharp cutting edges and wear resistance. In this study, milling tools made of the high performance ceramic SiAlON were compared to tools made from cemented carbide. For both tool materials, the influence of a prepared cutting edge was investigated. Both the tool manufacturing process and the cutting edge preparation processes are presented, followed by the application of those tools within milling experiments. In order to evaluate the efficiency of both tool types, the cutting forces and the cumulative process energy demand were analyzed. Additionally, surface roughness of the machined workpieces and tool wear were examined. It was found that the ceramic tools, although process forces were higher than for cemented carbide tools, exhibited by far lower energy consumption, less tool wear and finally generated lower surface roughness. © 2020, The Author(s). eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Berlin : Springer
dc.relation.ispartofseries Production Engineering 14 (2020), Nr. 3
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject Cutting edge preparation eng
dc.subject Grey cast iron eng
dc.subject High performance ceramics eng
dc.subject Milling tool manufacturing eng
dc.subject SiAlON eng
dc.subject Carbide cutting tools eng
dc.subject Carbide tools eng
dc.subject Ceramic tools eng
dc.subject Ceramics industry eng
dc.subject Energy utilization eng
dc.subject Hardness eng
dc.subject Manufacture eng
dc.subject Milling (machining) eng
dc.subject Surface roughness eng
dc.subject Wear of materials eng
dc.subject Wear resistance eng
dc.subject Cemented carbide tools eng
dc.subject Cemented carbides eng
dc.subject Ceramic tool materials eng
dc.subject Comparative analysis eng
dc.subject Cutting Edge Preparation eng
dc.subject High performance ceramics eng
dc.subject Tool manufacturing eng
dc.subject Tool requirements eng
dc.subject Cutting tools eng
dc.subject.ddc 620 | Ingenieurwissenschaften und Maschinenbau ger
dc.title A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end mills
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 1863-7353
dc.relation.issn 0944-6524
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-020-00966-9
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue 3
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 14
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 355
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage 364
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken