A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end mills

Downloadstatistik des Dokuments (Auswertung nach COUNTER):

Dröder, K.; Karpuschewski, B.; Uhlmann, E.; Arrabiyeh, P.A.; Berger, D. et al.: A comparative analysis of ceramic and cemented carbide end mills. In: Production Engineering 14 (2020), Nr. 3, S. 355-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-020-00966-9

Version im Repositorium

Zum Zitieren der Version im Repositorium verwenden Sie bitte diesen DOI: https://doi.org/10.15488/10992

Zeitraum, für den die Download-Zahlen angezeigt werden:

Jahr: 
Monat: 

Summe der Downloads: 169




Kleine Vorschau
Zusammenfassung: 
Milling of ferrous metals is usually performed by applying cemented carbide tools due to their high hardness, temperature and wear resistance. Recently, ceramic tool materials have been on the rise and enhanced the efficiency in machining. As ceramics are brittle-hard materials, tool manufacturing requires a sound knowledge in order to meet the tool requirements such as sharp cutting edges and wear resistance. In this study, milling tools made of the high performance ceramic SiAlON were compared to tools made from cemented carbide. For both tool materials, the influence of a prepared cutting edge was investigated. Both the tool manufacturing process and the cutting edge preparation processes are presented, followed by the application of those tools within milling experiments. In order to evaluate the efficiency of both tool types, the cutting forces and the cumulative process energy demand were analyzed. Additionally, surface roughness of the machined workpieces and tool wear were examined. It was found that the ceramic tools, although process forces were higher than for cemented carbide tools, exhibited by far lower energy consumption, less tool wear and finally generated lower surface roughness. © 2020, The Author(s).
Lizenzbestimmungen: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Publikationstyp: Article
Publikationsstatus: publishedVersion
Erstveröffentlichung: 2020
Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):Fakultät für Maschinenbau

Verteilung der Downloads über den gewählten Zeitraum:

Herkunft der Downloads nach Ländern:

Pos. Land Downloads
Anzahl Proz.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 91 53,85%
2 image of flag of United States United States 30 17,75%
3 image of flag of China China 8 4,73%
4 image of flag of No geo information available No geo information available 5 2,96%
5 image of flag of India India 4 2,37%
6 image of flag of Vietnam Vietnam 3 1,78%
7 image of flag of Czech Republic Czech Republic 3 1,78%
8 image of flag of Australia Australia 3 1,78%
9 image of flag of Russian Federation Russian Federation 2 1,18%
10 image of flag of Austria Austria 2 1,18%
    andere 18 10,65%

Weitere Download-Zahlen und Ranglisten:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.