Incorporation of EPA and DHA into plasma phospholipids in response to different omega-3 fatty acid formulations - A comparative bioavailability study of fish oil vs. krill oil

Downloadstatistik des Dokuments (Auswertung nach COUNTER):

Schuchardt, Jan Philipp; Schneider, Inga; Meyer, Henrike; Neubronner, Juliane; Von Schacky, C. et al.: Incorporation of EPA and DHA into plasma phospholipids in response to different omega-3 fatty acid formulations - A comparative bioavailability study of fish oil vs. krill oil. In: Lipids in Health and Disease 10 (2011), 145. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-10-145

Version im Repositorium

Zum Zitieren der Version im Repositorium verwenden Sie bitte diesen DOI: https://doi.org/10.15488/608

Zeitraum, für den die Download-Zahlen angezeigt werden:

Jahr: 
Monat: 

Summe der Downloads: 340




Kleine Vorschau
Zusammenfassung: 
Background: Bioavailability of omega-3 fatty acids (FA) depends on their chemical form. Superior bioavailability has been suggested for phospholipid (PL) bound omega-3 FA in krill oil, but identical doses of different chemical forms have not been compared. Methods. In a double-blinded crossover trial, we compared the uptake of three EPA+DHA formulations derived from fish oil (re-esterified triacylglycerides [rTAG], ethyl-esters [EE]) and krill oil (mainly PL). Changes of the FA compositions in plasma PL were used as a proxy for bioavailability. Twelve healthy young men (mean age 31 y) were randomized to 1680 mg EPA+DHA given either as rTAG, EE or krill oil. FA levels in plasma PL were analyzed pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48, and 72 h after capsule ingestion. Additionally, the proportion of free EPA and DHA in the applied supplements was analyzed. Results: The highest incorporation of EPA+DHA into plasma PL was provoked by krill oil (mean AUC 0-72 h: 80.03 34.71%*h), followed by fish oil rTAG (mean AUC 0-72 h: 59.78 36.75%*h) and EE (mean AUC 0-72 h: 47.53 38.42%*h). Due to high standard deviation values, there were no significant differences for DHA and the sum of EPA+DHA levels between the three treatments. However, a trend (p = 0.057) was observed for the differences in EPA bioavailability. Statistical pair-wise group comparison's revealed a trend (p = 0.086) between rTAG and krill oil. FA analysis of the supplements showed that the krill oil sample contained 22% of the total EPA amount as free EPA and 21% of the total DHA amount as free DHA, while the two fish oil samples did not contain any free FA. Conclusion: Further studies with a larger sample size carried out over a longer period are needed to substantiate our findings and to determine differences in EPA+DHA bioavailability between three common chemical forms of LC n-3 FA (rTAG, EE and krill oil). The unexpected high content of free EPA and DHA in krill oil, which might have a significant influence on the availability of EPA+DHA from krill oil, should be investigated in more depth and taken into consideration in future trials.
Lizenzbestimmungen: CC BY 2.0 Unported
Publikationstyp: Article
Publikationsstatus: publishedVersion
Erstveröffentlichung: 2011
Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät

Verteilung der Downloads über den gewählten Zeitraum:

Herkunft der Downloads nach Ländern:

Pos. Land Downloads
Anzahl Proz.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 234 68,82%
2 image of flag of United States United States 32 9,41%
3 image of flag of China China 14 4,12%
4 image of flag of France France 11 3,24%
5 image of flag of United Kingdom United Kingdom 6 1,76%
6 image of flag of Brazil Brazil 6 1,76%
7 image of flag of Korea, Republic of Korea, Republic of 5 1,47%
8 image of flag of Thailand Thailand 3 0,88%
9 image of flag of Czech Republic Czech Republic 2 0,59%
10 image of flag of Australia Australia 2 0,59%
    andere 25 7,35%

Weitere Download-Zahlen und Ranglisten:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.