Markkanen, T.; Steinfeld, G.; Kljun, N.; Raasch, S.; Foken, T.: Comparison of conventional lagrangian stochastic footprint models against les driven footprint estimates. In: Atmospheric Chemistry And Physics 9 (2009), Nr. 15, S. 5575-5586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5575-2009
Zusammenfassung: | |
In this study we introduce a comparison method for footprint model results by evaluating the performance of conventional Lagrangian stochastic (LS) footprint models that use parameterised flow field characteristics with results of a Lagrangian trajectory model embedded in a large eddy simulation (LES) framework. The two conventional models follow the particles backward and forward in time while the trajectories in LES only evolve forward in time. We assess their performance in two unstably stratified boundary layers at observation levels covering the whole depth of the atmospheric boundary layer. We present a concept for footprint model comparison that can be applied for 2-D footprints and demonstrate that comparison of only cross wind integrated footprints is not sufficient for purposes facilitating two dimensional footprint information. Because the flow field description among the three models is most realistic in LES we use those results as the reference in the comparison. We found that the agreement of the two conventional models against the LES is generally better for intermediate measurement heights and for the more unstable case, whereas the two conventional flux footprint models agree best under less unstable conditions. The model comparison in 2-D was found quite sensitive to the grid resolution. | |
Lizenzbestimmungen: | CC BY 3.0 Unported |
Publikationstyp: | Article |
Publikationsstatus: | publishedVersion |
Erstveröffentlichung: | 2009 |
Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en): | Fakultät für Mathematik und Physik |
Pos. | Land | Downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Anzahl | Proz. | |||
1 | Germany | 176 | 71,26% | |
2 | United States | 31 | 12,55% | |
3 | China | 11 | 4,45% | |
4 | No geo information available | 4 | 1,62% | |
5 | Netherlands | 3 | 1,21% | |
6 | Russian Federation | 2 | 0,81% | |
7 | India | 2 | 0,81% | |
8 | United Kingdom | 2 | 0,81% | |
9 | Czech Republic | 2 | 0,81% | |
10 | Australia | 2 | 0,81% | |
andere | 12 | 4,86% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.