Willingness to Pay for a Highland Agricultural Restriction Policy to Improve Water Quality in South Korea: Correcting Anomalous Preference in Contingent Valuation Method

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/1605
dc.identifier.uri http://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/1630
dc.contributor.author Choi, Ik-Chang
dc.contributor.author Kim, Hyun No
dc.contributor.author Shin, Hio-Jung
dc.contributor.author Tenhunen, John
dc.contributor.author Nguyen, Trung
dc.date.accessioned 2017-05-31T11:36:50Z
dc.date.available 2017-05-31T11:36:50Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Choi, Ik-Chang; Kim, Hyun-No; Shin, Hio-Jung; Tenhunen, John; Nguyen, Trung: Willingness to Pay for a Highland Agricultural Restriction Policy to Improve Water Quality in South Korea: Correcting Anomalous Preference in Contingent Valuation Method. In: Water 8 (2016), Nr. 11, 547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w8110547
dc.description.abstract This study examines the willingness to pay (WTP) for the highland agriculture restriction policy which aims to stabilize the water quality in the Han River basin, South Korea. To estimate the WTP, we use a double-bounded contingent valuation method and a random-effects interval-data regression. We extend contingent valuation studies by dealing with the potential preference anomalies (shift, anchoring, and inconsistent response effects). The result indicates that after the preference anomalies are corrected, the statistical precision of parameter estimates is improved. After correcting the potential preference anomalies, estimated welfare gains are on average South Korean currency (KRW) 2,861 per month per household. Based on the WTP estimate, the total benefits from the land use restriction policy are around KRW 297.73 billion and the total costs are around KRW 129.44 billion. The net benefit is, thus, around KRW 168.29 billion. This study suggests several practical solutions that would be useful for the water management. First, a priority should be given to the valid compensation for the highland farmers’ expected income loss. Second, it is necessary to increase in the unit cost of the highland purchase. Third, wasted or inefficiently used costs (e.g., overinvestment in waste treatment facilities, and temporary upstream community support) should be transferred to the program associated with high mountainous agriculture field purchase. Results of our analysis support South Korean legislators and land use policy makers with useful information for the approval and operationalization of the policy. eng
dc.description.sponsorship DFG/GRK 1565/1
dc.description.sponsorship University of Bayreuth
dc.description.sponsorship National Research Foundation of Korea
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Basel : MDPI AG
dc.relation.ispartofseries Water 8 (2016), Nr. 11
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject benefit-cost analysis eng
dc.subject double-bounded contingent valuation method eng
dc.subject potential preference anomalies eng
dc.subject random-effects interval-data regression eng
dc.subject willingness to pay eng
dc.subject.ddc 333,7 | Natürliche Ressourcen, Energie und Umwelt ger
dc.title Willingness to Pay for a Highland Agricultural Restriction Policy to Improve Water Quality in South Korea: Correcting Anomalous Preference in Contingent Valuation Method eng
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.issn 2073-4441
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.3390/w8110547
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue 11
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 8
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 547
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken