Supporting Shared Understanding in Asynchronous Communication Contexts

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Nagel, L.; Karras, O.; Amiri, S.M.; Schneider, K.: Supporting Shared Understanding in Asynchronous Communication Contexts. In: Ferrari, A.; Penzenstadler, B. (Eds.): Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, REFSQ. Cham: Springer, 2023 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science ; 13975), S. 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29786-1_3

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/16373

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 12




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
[Context and motivation] The success of software projects depends on developing a system that satisfies the stakeholders’ wishes and needs according to their mental models of the intended system. However, stakeholders may have different or misaligned mental models of the same system, resulting in conflicting requirements. For this reason, aligned mental models and thus a shared understanding of the project vision is essential for the success of software projects. [Question/problem] While it is already challenging to achieve shared understanding in synchronous contexts, such as meetings, it is even more challenging when only asynchronous contexts, like messaging services, are possible. When multiple stakeholders are involved from different locations and time zones, primarily asynchronous communication occurs. Despite the frequent use of software tools, like Confluence, to support asynchronous contexts, their use for the development of a shared understanding has hardly been analyzed. [Principal ideas/results] In this paper, we propose five concepts to help stakeholders develop a shared understanding in asynchronous communication contexts. We assess the adaptability of three existing software tools to our concepts, adapt these software tools accordingly, and develop our own prototype that implements all five concepts. In an experiment with 30 participants, we evaluate these four software tools and compare them to a control group that had no support in developing a shared understanding. [Contribution] Our results show the suitability of our concepts, as the participants using our concepts were able to achieve a higher level of shared understanding compared to the control group.
License of this version: Es gilt deutsches Urheberrecht. Das Dokument darf zum eigenen Gebrauch kostenfrei genutzt, aber nicht im Internet bereitgestellt oder an Außenstehende weitergegeben werden.
Document Type: BookPart
Publishing status: acceptedVersion
Issue Date: 2023
Appears in Collections:Fakultät für Elektrotechnik und Informatik

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 5 41.67%
2 image of flag of United States United States 3 25.00%
3 image of flag of Philippines Philippines 1 8.33%
4 image of flag of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 8.33%
5 image of flag of France France 1 8.33%
6 image of flag of Australia Australia 1 8.33%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse