Why PV Modules Should Preferably No Longer Be Oriented to the South in the Near Future

Show simple item record

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/9365
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/9419
dc.contributor.author Mubarak, Riyad ger
dc.contributor.author Weide Luiz, Eduardo ger
dc.contributor.author Seckmeyer, Gunther ger
dc.date.accessioned 2020-02-14T17:04:28Z
dc.date.available 2020-02-14T17:04:28Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation Mubarak, R.; Weide Luiz, E., Seckmeyer, G.: Why PV Modules Should Preferably No Longer Be Oriented to the South in the Near Future. In: Energies 12 (2019), Nr. 23, 4528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12234528 ger
dc.description.abstract PV modules tilted and oriented toward east and west directions gain gradually more importance as an alternative to the presently-preferred south (north in the Southern Hemisphere) orientation and it is shown to become economically superior even under the reimbursement of feed-in tariff (FIT). This is a consequence of the increasing spread between the decreasing costs of self-consumed solar power and the costs for power from the grid. One-minute values of irradiance were measured by silicon sensors at different orientations and tilt angles in Hannover (Germany) over three years. We show that south-oriented collectors give the highest electrical power during the day, whereas combinations of east and west orientations (E-W) result in the highest self-consumption rate (SC), and combinations of southeast and southwest (SE-SW) orientations result in the highest degree of autarky (AD), although they reduce the yearly PV Power by 5–6%. Moreover, the economic analysis of PV systems without FIT shows that the SE-SW and E-W combinations have the lowest electricity cost and they are more beneficial in terms of internal rate of return (IRR), compared to the S orientation at the same tilt. For PV systems with FIT, the S orientation presently provides the highest transfer of money from the supplier. However, as a consequence of the continuing decline of FIT, the economic advantage of S orientation is decreasing. E-W and SE-SW orientations are more beneficial for the owner as soon as FIT decreases to 7 Ct/kWh. East and west orientations of PV modules do not only have benefits for the individual owner but avoid high costs for storing energy—regardless who would own the storage facilities—and by avoiding high noon peaks of solar energy production during sunny periods, which would become an increasing problem for the grid if more solar power is installed. Furthermore, two types of commonly used PV software (PVSOL and PVsyst) were used to simulate the system performance. The comparison with measurements showed that both PV software underestimate SC and AD for all studied orientations, leading to the conclusion that improvements are necessary in modelling. ger
dc.language.iso eng ger
dc.publisher Basel : MDPI
dc.relation.ispartofseries Energies 12 (2019), Nr. 23 ger
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported ger
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ger
dc.subject incident solar radiation eng
dc.subject PV output power modelling eng
dc.subject tilt angle eng
dc.subject orientation eng
dc.subject rooftop solar eng
dc.subject.ddc 620 | Ingenieurwissenschaften und Maschinenbau ger
dc.title Why PV Modules Should Preferably No Longer Be Oriented to the South in the Near Future eng
dc.type Article ger
dc.type Text ger
dc.relation.doi 10.3390/en12234528
dc.description.version publishedVersion ger
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s):

Show simple item record


Search the repository


My Account

Usage Statistics