Developing Better Measures of Neighbourhood Characteristics and Change for Use in Studies of Residential Mobility: A Case Study of Britain in the Early 2000s

Show simple item record

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/850
dc.identifier.uri http://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/874
dc.contributor.author Gambaro, Ludovica
dc.contributor.author Joshi, Heather
dc.contributor.author Lupton, Ruth
dc.contributor.author Fenton, Alex
dc.contributor.author Lennon, Mary Clare
dc.date.accessioned 2016-12-16T09:16:38Z
dc.date.available 2016-12-16T09:16:38Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Gambaro, L.; Joshi, H.; Lupton, R.; Fenton, A.; Lennon, M.C.:Developing Better Measures of Neighbourhood Characteristics and Change for Use in Studies of Residential Mobility: A Case Study of Britain in the Early 2000s. In: Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 9 (2016), Nr. 4, S. 569-590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-015-9164-0
dc.description.abstract This paper addresses the problem of measuring neighbourhood characteristics and change when working with individual level datasets to understand the effects of residential mobility. Currently available measures in Britain are in various respects unsuitable for this purpose. The paper explores a new indicator of small area poverty: the Unadjusted Means-tested Benefits Rate (UMBR), which divides claimants of means-tested benefits in a small area by the number of households. We describe changes in area poverty between 2001 and 2006, using UMBR. As often assumed, these are generally negligible, but small areas in “disadvantaged urban“ and “multicultural city life“ communities did change considerably in this period. We also link UMBR to the first three waves of the UK Millennium Cohort Study, a survey of families with children born at the beginning of the 2000s. We examine opinions about neighbourhood and find that parents living in areas of higher poverty did tend to express more negative views than those living elsewhere. Living in high poverty areas was also associated with moving home, and those families who retrospectively gave neighbourhood considerations as reasons for moving did move into areas with markedly lower poverty rates. Finally, we compare families' moving trajectories to trends in poverty within areas. We are able to show that a large proportion of families who moved to poorer neighbourhoods were at double disadvantage, as they often moved to areas with increasing poverty rates. We conclude that UMBR can be used to enhance understanding of changing neighbourhood contexts in cohort studies, at least for this period, although it still suffers from the same conceptual and technical difficulties as other available alternatives in terms of its ability to capture aspects of neighbourhood quality. eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Berlin : Kluwer Academic Publishers
dc.relation.ispartofseries Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 9 (2016), Nr. 4
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject Children eng
dc.subject Cohort studies eng
dc.subject Neighbourhood characteristics eng
dc.subject Poverty measurement eng
dc.subject Residential mobility eng
dc.subject.ddc 300 | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie, Anthropologie ger
dc.title Developing Better Measures of Neighbourhood Characteristics and Change for Use in Studies of Residential Mobility: A Case Study of Britain in the Early 2000s eng
dc.type article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.issn 1874463X
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-015-9164-0
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue 4
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 9
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 569
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage 590
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s):

Show simple item record

 

Search the repository


Browse

My Account

Usage Statistics