Mapping Control of Erosion Rates: Comparing Model and Monitoring Data for Croplands in Northern Germany

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/4278
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/4312
dc.contributor.author Steinhoff-Knopp, Bastian ger
dc.contributor.author Burkhard, Benjamin ger
dc.date.accessioned 2018-12-21T12:10:35Z
dc.date.available 2018-12-21T12:10:35Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation Steinhoff-Knopp, B.; Burkhard, B.: Mapping Control of Erosion Rates: Comparing Model and Monitoring Data for Croplands in Northern Germany. In: One Ecosystem 3 (2018), e26382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e26382 ger
dc.description.abstract Control of erosion rates (CER) is a key ecosystem service for soil protection. It is mandatory for sustaining the capacity, especially of agroecosystems, to provide ecosystem services. By applying an established framework to assess soil regulating services, this study compares two approaches to assess CER provision for 466 ha of cropland in Lower Saxony (Central Northern Germany). In a "sealed modelling approach", the structural and the mitigated structural impact were modelled by applying the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE). The second approach uses spatially explicit long-term monitoring data on soil loss rates obtained in the investigation area as an alternative to the USLE-based modelled mitigated structural impact. Assuming that the monitoring data have a higher reliability than the modelled data, the comparison of both approaches demonstrated the uncertainties of the USLE-based assessment of CER. The calculated indicators based on a sound monitoring database on soil loss rates showed that, due to limitations of the USLE model, the structural impact in thalwegs has been underestimated. Incorporating models with the ability to estimate soil loss by rilling und gullying can help to overcome this uncertainty. The produced set of complementary large-scale CER maps enables an integrated analyses of CER. In the entire investigation area, the provision of CER regulating ecosystem services was generally high, indicating good management practices. Differences at the field scale and between the different regions can be explained by variations of the structural impact and the management practices. ger
dc.language.iso eng ger
dc.publisher Sofia : Pensoft Publishers
dc.relation.ispartofseries One Ecosystem 3 (2018) ger
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject regulating ecosystem service eng
dc.subject control of erosion rates eng
dc.subject biophysical method eng
dc.subject USLE eng
dc.subject soil erosion eng
dc.subject monitoring eng
dc.subject.ddc 550 | Geowissenschaften ger
dc.title Mapping Control of Erosion Rates: Comparing Model and Monitoring Data for Croplands in Northern Germany eng
dc.type Article ger
dc.type Text ger
dc.relation.doi 10.3897/oneeco.3.e26382
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage e26382
dc.description.version publishedVersion ger
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken