Rainfall disaggregation for hydrological modeling: is there a need for spatial consistence?

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/3923
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/3957
dc.contributor.author Müller-Thomy, Hannes ger
dc.contributor.author Wallner, Markus ger
dc.contributor.author Förster, Kristian ger
dc.date.accessioned 2018-11-07T11:26:28Z
dc.date.available 2018-11-07T11:26:28Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation Müller-Thomy, H.; Wallner, M.; Förster, K.: Rainfall disaggregation for hydrological modeling: is there a need for spatial consistence? In: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 22 (2018), S. 5259-5280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5259-2018 ger
dc.description.abstract In this study, the influence of disaggregated rainfall products with different degrees of spatial consistence on rainfall–runoff modeling results is analyzed for three mesoscale catchments in Lower Saxony, Germany. For the disaggregation of daily rainfall time series into hourly values, a multiplicative random cascade model is applied. The disaggregation is applied on a station by station basis without consideration of surrounding stations; hence subsequent steps are then required to implement spatial consistence. Spatial consistence is represented here by three bivariate spatial rainfall characteristics that complement each other. A resampling algorithm and a parallelization approach are evaluated against the disaggregated time series without any subsequent steps. With respect to rainfall, clear differences between these three approaches can be identified regarding bivariate spatial rainfall characteristics, areal rainfall intensities and extreme values. The resampled time series lead to the best agreement with the observed ones. Using these different rainfall products as input to hydrological modeling, we hypothesize that derived runoff statistics – with emphasis on seasonal extreme values – are subject to similar differences as well. However, an impact on the extreme values' statistics of the hydrological simulations forced by different rainfall approaches cannot be detected. Several modifications of the study design using rainfall–runoff models with and without parameter calibration or using different rain gauge densities lead to similar results in runoff statistics. Only if the spatially highly resolved rainfall–runoff WaSiM model is applied instead of the semi-distributed HBV-IWW model can slight differences regarding the seasonal peak flows be identified. Hence, the hypothesis formulated before is rejected in this case study. These findings suggest that (i) simple model structures might compensate for deficiencies in spatial representativeness through parameterization and (ii) highly resolved hydrological models benefit from improved spatial modeling of rainfall. ger
dc.language.iso eng ger
dc.publisher München : European Geosciences Union
dc.relation.ispartofseries Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 22 (2018) ger
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject Rainfall disaggregation eng
dc.subject Lower Saxony, Germany eng
dc.subject Hydrological modelling eng
dc.subject.ddc 550 | Geowissenschaften ger
dc.subject.ddc 551 | Geologie, Hydrologie, Meteorologie ger
dc.title Rainfall disaggregation for hydrological modeling: is there a need for spatial consistence? eng
dc.type Article ger
dc.type Text ger
dc.relation.doi 10.5194/hess-22-5259-2018
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 5259
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage 5280
dc.description.version publishedVersion ger
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken