Bagging prevents russeting and decreases postharvest water loss of mango fruit cv. ‘Apple’

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/16780
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/16907
dc.contributor.author Athoo, Thomas O.
dc.contributor.author Yegon, Dennis
dc.contributor.author Owino, Willis O.
dc.contributor.author Knoche, Moritz
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-25T08:11:00Z
dc.date.available 2024-03-25T08:11:00Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.identifier.citation Athoo, T.O.; Yegon, D.; Owino, W.O.; Knoche, M.: Bagging prevents russeting and decreases postharvest water loss of mango fruit cv. ‘Apple’. In: Postharvest Biology and Technology 211 (2024), 112804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2024.112804
dc.description.abstract In Kenya, the mango (Mangifera indica L) cultivar ‘Apple’ is commercially important but it often suffers excessive russeting, which both compromises its appearance and impairs its postharvest performance. Together, these effects seriously reduce its market potential. Exposure to surface moisture is implicated in russeting of cv. ‘Apple’ mango. The objective was to establish the effect of bagging on russeting. Developing fruit were bagged at the onset of the exponential growth phase, using brown paper bags (Blue star®). Un-bagged fruit served as controls. The brown paper bags were selected because of their high permeance to water vapor. At harvest maturity, bagged fruit were larger, less russeted and had smaller lenticels than un-bagged control fruit. Staining with aqueous acridine orange in conjunction with fluorescence microscopy revealed numerous microcracks and larger lenticels on un-bagged control fruit but these were not evident on bagged fruit. Postharvest mass loss (principally water loss) of bagged fruit was lower than of un-bagged control fruit. In the un-bagged control fruit, the skin's water permeance increased as the russeted surface area increased (r2 = 0.88 **). Fruit skins were less permeable to water vapor than the brown paper bags. The brown paper bags contributed not more than 4.2 to 9.1% of the total in-series diffusion resistance of skin + bag. The masses of isolated cuticular membranes, and of dewaxed cuticular membranes, and of wax per unit surface area were higher for un-bagged control fruit than for bagged fruit. Bagged fruit were also greener and showed less blush. There was little difference in skin carotenoid content between bagged and un-bagged control fruit, but skin anthocyanin content was lower in bagged fruit. The rates of respiration and ethylene evolution of bagged fruit were lower than those of un-bagged control fruit. There were no differences between bagged and un-bagged control fruit in their organoleptic and nutritional properties including titratable acidity, total soluble sugars, sucrose, glucose, fructose, vitamin C and calcium content. In conclusion, bagging decreased russeting and increased postharvest performance of fruit of mango cv. ‘Apple’. eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science
dc.relation.ispartofseries Postharvest Biology and Technology 211 (2024)
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subject Bag eng
dc.subject Cuticle eng
dc.subject Lenticel eng
dc.subject Periderm eng
dc.subject Permeance eng
dc.subject Quality eng
dc.subject Russet eng
dc.subject Transpiration eng
dc.subject.ddc 570 | Biowissenschaften, Biologie
dc.subject.ddc 630 | Landwirtschaft, Veterinärmedizin
dc.title Bagging prevents russeting and decreases postharvest water loss of mango fruit cv. ‘Apple’ eng
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 1873-2356
dc.relation.issn 0925-5214
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2024.112804
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 211
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 112804
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken