Large-eddy simulation of a 15 GW wind farm: Flow effects, energy budgets and comparison with wake models

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/14886
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/15005
dc.contributor.author Maas, Oliver
dc.date.accessioned 2023-10-06T05:24:40Z
dc.date.available 2023-10-06T05:24:40Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation Maas, O.: Large-eddy simulation of a 15 GW wind farm: Flow effects, energy budgets and comparison with wake models. In: Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering 9 (2023), 1108180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2023.1108180
dc.description.abstract Planned offshore wind farm clusters have a rated capacity of more than 10 GW. The layout optimization and yield estimation of wind farms is often performed with computationally inexpensive, analytical wake models. As recent research results show, the flow physics in large (multi-gigawatt) offshore wind farms are more complex than in small (sub-gigawatt) wind farms. Since analytical wake models are tuned with data of existing, sub-gigawatt wind farms they might not produce accurate results for large wind farm clusters. In this study the results of a large-eddy simulation of a 15 GW wind farm are compared with two analytical wake models to demonstrate potential discrepancies. The TurbOPark model and the Niayifar and Porté-Agel model are chosen because they use a Gaussian wake profile and a turbulence model. The wind farm has a finite size in the crosswise direction, unlike as in many other large-eddy simulation wind farm studies, in which the wind farm is effectively infinitely wide due to the cyclic boundary conditions. The results show that new effects like crosswise divergence and convergence occur in such a finite-size multi-gigawatt wind farm. The comparison with the wake models shows that there are large discrepancies of up to 40% between the predicted wind farm power output of the wake models and the large-eddy simulation. An energy budget analysis is made to explain the discrepancies. It shows that the wake models neglect relevant kinetic energy sources and sinks like the geostrophic forcing, the energy input by pressure gradients and energy dissipation. Taking some of these sources and sinks into account could improve the accuracy of the wake models. eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Lausanne : Frontiers Media
dc.relation.ispartofseries Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering 9 (2023)
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subject energy budget analysis eng
dc.subject global blockage effect eng
dc.subject gravity waves eng
dc.subject large wind farms eng
dc.subject large-eddy simulation eng
dc.subject PALM eng
dc.subject TurbOPark eng
dc.subject wake model eng
dc.subject.ddc 620 | Ingenieurwissenschaften und Maschinenbau
dc.title Large-eddy simulation of a 15 GW wind farm: Flow effects, energy budgets and comparison with wake models eng
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 2297-3079
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2023.1108180
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 9
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 1108180
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken