Influence of spatial interpolation methods for climate variables on the simulation of discharge and nitrate fate with SWAT

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/1426
dc.identifier.uri http://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/1451
dc.contributor.author Van Der Heijden, S.
dc.contributor.author Haberlandt, Uwe
dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-28T08:38:52Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-28T08:38:52Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.citation Van Der Heijden, S.; Haberlandt, U.: Influence of spatial interpolation methods for climate variables on the simulation of discharge and nitrate fate with SWAT. In: Advances in Geosciences 27 (2010), S. 91-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-27-91-2010
dc.description.abstract For ecohydrological modeling climate variables are needed on subbasin basis. Since they usually originate from point measurements spatial interpolation is required during preprocessing. Different interpolation methods yield data of varying quality, which can strongly influence modeling results. Four interpolation methods to be compared were selected: nearest neighbour, inverse distance, ordinary kriging, and kriging with external drift (Goovaerts, 1997). This study presents three strategies to evaluate the influence of the interpolation method on the modeling results of discharge and nitrate load in the river in a mesoscale river catchment (∼1000 km2) using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT, Neitsch et al., 2005) model: <br><br> I. Automated calibration of the model with a mixed climate data set and consecutive application of the four interpolated data sets. <br><br> II. Consecutive automated calibration of the model with each of the four climate data sets. <br><br> III. Random generation of 1000 model parameter sets and consecutive application of the four interpolated climate data sets on each of the 1000 realisations, evaluating the number of realisations above a certain quality criterion threshold. <br><br> Results show that strategies I and II are not suitable for evaluation of the quality of the interpolated data. Strategy III however proves a significant influence of the interpolation method on nitrate modeling. A rank order from the simplest to the most sophisticated method is visible, with kriging with external drift (KED) outperforming all others. Responsible for this behaviour is the variable temperature, which benefits most from more sophisticated methods and at the same time is the main driving force for the nitrate cycle. The missing influence of the interpolation methods on discharge modeling is explained by a much higher measuring network density for precipitation than for all other climate variables. eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Göttingen : Copernicus GmbH
dc.relation.ispartofseries Advances in Geosciences 27 (2010)
dc.rights CC BY 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.subject catchment eng
dc.subject computer simulation eng
dc.subject ecohydrology eng
dc.subject hydrological modeling eng
dc.subject interpolation eng
dc.subject kriging eng
dc.subject nitrate eng
dc.subject precipitation (climatology) eng
dc.subject river discharge eng
dc.subject.ddc 550 | Geowissenschaften ger
dc.title Influence of spatial interpolation methods for climate variables on the simulation of discharge and nitrate fate with SWAT
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.issn 1680-7340
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-27-91-2010
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 27
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 91
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage 98
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken