Low impact of regular PCR testing on presence at work site during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences during an open observational study in Lower Saxony 2020-21

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/13346
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/13455
dc.contributor.author Seiler, Lisa K.
dc.contributor.author Stolpe, Susanne
dc.contributor.author Stanislawski, Nils
dc.contributor.author Stahl, Frank
dc.contributor.author Witt, Martin
dc.contributor.author Jonczyk, Rebecca
dc.contributor.author Heiden, Stefanie
dc.contributor.author Blume, Holger
dc.contributor.author Kowall, Bernd
dc.contributor.author Blume, Cornelia
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-21T06:08:04Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-21T06:08:04Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation Seiler, L.K.; Stolpe, S.; Stanislawski, N.; Stahl, F.; Witt, M. et al.: Low impact of regular PCR testing on presence at work site during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences during an open observational study in Lower Saxony 2020-21. In: BMC public health 23 (2023), 240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15036-9
dc.description.abstract Background: Since social distancing during the COVID-19-pandemic had a profound impact on professional life, this study investigated the effect of PCR testing on on-site work. Methods: PCR screening, antibody testing, and questionnaires offered to 4,890 working adults in Lower Saxony were accompanied by data collection on demographics, family status, comorbidities, social situation, health-related behavior, and the number of work-related contacts. Relative risks (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals were estimated for the associations between regular PCR testing and other work and health-related variables, respectively, and working on-site. Analyses were stratified by the suitability of work tasks for mobile office. Results: Between April 2020 and February 2021, 1,643 employees underwent PCR testing. Whether mobile working was possible strongly influenced the work behavior. Persons whose work was suitable for mobile office (mobile workers) had a lower probability of working on-site than persons whose work was not suitable for mobile office (RR = 0.09 (95 % CI: 0.07 – 0.12)). In mobile workers, regular PCR-testing was slightly associated with working on-site (RR = 1.19 (0.66; 2.14)). In those whose working place was unsuitable for mobile office, the corresponding RR was 0.94 (0.80; 1.09). Compared to persons without chronic diseases, chronically ill persons worked less often on-site if their workplace was suitable for mobile office (RR = 0.73 (0.40; 1.33)), but even more often if their workplace was not suitable for mobile office (RR = 1.17 (1.04; 1.33)). Conclusion: If work was suitable for mobile office, regular PCR-testing did not have a strong effect on presence at the work site. Trial registration: An ethics vote of the responsible medical association (Lower Saxony, Germany) retrospectively approved the evaluation of the collected subject data in a pseudonymized form in the context of medical studies (No. Bo/30/2020; Bo/31/2020; Bo/32/2020). eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher London : BioMed Central
dc.relation.ispartofseries BMC public health 23 (2023)
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject COVID-19 eng
dc.subject Home Office eng
dc.subject PCR test eng
dc.subject Workplace safety eng
dc.subject.ddc 610 | Medizin, Gesundheit ger
dc.title Low impact of regular PCR testing on presence at work site during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences during an open observational study in Lower Saxony 2020-21
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 1471-2458
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15036-9
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 23
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 240
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken