Classification of Terrestrial Laser Scanner Point Clouds: A Comparison of Methods for Landslide Monitoring from Mathematical Surface Approximation

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/13137
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/13242
dc.contributor.author Kermarrec, Gaël
dc.contributor.author Yang, Zhonglong
dc.contributor.author Czerwonka-Schröder, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-12T14:52:30Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-12T14:52:30Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.citation Kermarrec, G.; Yang, Z.; Czerwonka-Schröder, D.: Classification of Terrestrial Laser Scanner Point Clouds: A Comparison of Methods for Landslide Monitoring from Mathematical Surface Approximation. In: Remote sensing 14 (2022), Nr. 20, 5099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14205099
dc.description.abstract Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) are contact-free measuring sensors that record dense point clouds of objects or scenes by acquiring coordinates and an intensity value for each point. The point clouds are scattered and noisy. Performing a mathematical surface approximation instead of working directly on the point cloud is an efficient way to reduce the data storage and structure the point clouds by transforming “data” to “information”. Applications include rigorous statistical testing for deformation analysis within the context of landslide monitoring. In order to reach an optimal approximation, classification and segmentation algorithms can identify and remove inhomogeneous structures, such as trees or bushes, to obtain a smooth and accurate mathematical surface of the ground. In this contribution, we compare methods to perform the classification of TLS point clouds with the aim of guiding the reader through the existing algorithms. Besides the traditional point cloud filtering methods, we will analyze machine learning classification algorithms based on the manual extraction of point cloud features, and a deep learning approach with automatic extraction of features called PointNet++. We have intentionally chosen strategies easy to implement and understand so that our results are reproducible for similar point clouds. We show that each method has advantages and drawbacks, depending on user criteria, such as the computational time, the classification accuracy needed, whether manual extraction is performed or not, and if prior information is required. We highlight that filtering methods are advantageous for the application at hand and perform a mathematical surface approximation as an illustration. Accordingly, we have chosen locally refined B-splines, which were shown to provide an optimal and computationally manageable approximation of TLS point clouds. eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Basel : MDPI
dc.relation.ispartofseries Remote sensing 14 (2022), Nr. 20
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject terrestrial laser scanner eng
dc.subject point cloud eng
dc.subject classification eng
dc.subject segmentation eng
dc.subject deep learning eng
dc.subject landslide monitoring eng
dc.subject PointNet++ eng
dc.subject LR B-splines eng
dc.subject.ddc 620 | Ingenieurwissenschaften und Maschinenbau ger
dc.title Classification of Terrestrial Laser Scanner Point Clouds: A Comparison of Methods for Landslide Monitoring from Mathematical Surface Approximation eng
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 2072-4292
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14205099
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue 20
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 14
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 5099
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken