Evaluation of common tests for fracture characterisation of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/1276
dc.identifier.uri http://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/1301
dc.contributor.author Peshekhodov, Ilya
dc.contributor.author Dykiert, M.
dc.contributor.author Vucetic, Milan
dc.contributor.author Behrens, Bernd-Arno
dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-06T06:44:30Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-06T06:44:30Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Peshekhodov, I.; Dykiert, M.; Vucetic, M.; Behrens, B.-A.: Evaluation of common tests for fracture characterisation of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 159 (2016), Nr. 1, 12014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/159/1/012014
dc.description.abstract The paper presents results of evaluation of common tests for fracture characterization of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA. The tests include three in-plane shear tests, two uniaxial tension tests, two plane strain tension tests and two equibiaxial tension tests. Three high-strength steels with different yield loci, strain hardening rates and strengths in three different thicknesses each were used. The evaluation was performed based on the spatial distribution of the equivalent plastic strain and damage variable in the specimen at the moment of crack initiation as well as on the time variation of the stress state at the crack initiation location. For in-plane shear, uniaxial tension and plane strain tension, no test can be unconditionally recommended as disadvantages of all studied tests in these groups cannot be neglected. However, in each of these groups, a test can be chosen, which represents an acceptable compromise between its advantages and disadvantages: the shear test on an IFUM butterfly specimen for in-plane shear, the tensile test on a holed specimen for uniaxial tension and the tensile test on a waisted specimen for plane strain tension. On the contrary, the bulge test on a circular specimen with a punch of Ø 100 mm can be unconditionally recommended for equibiaxial tension. In the future, optimisation of the studied tests for in-plane shear, uniaxial tension and plane strain tension appears to be necessary. eng
dc.description.sponsorship FOSTA
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Bristol : Institute of Physics Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofseries IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 159 (2016), Nr. 1
dc.rights CC BY 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.subject Crack initiation eng
dc.subject Cracks eng
dc.subject Drawing (forming) eng
dc.subject Fracture eng
dc.subject Plastic deformation eng
dc.subject Strain eng
dc.subject Strain hardening eng
dc.subject Strain rate eng
dc.subject Tensile testing eng
dc.subject Damage variables eng
dc.subject Equivalent plastic strain eng
dc.subject Fracture characterisation eng
dc.subject Fracture characterization eng
dc.subject High strength sheets eng
dc.subject Plane strain tension eng
dc.subject Strain hardening rate eng
dc.subject Uniaxial tensions eng
dc.subject High strength steel eng
dc.subject.classification Konferenzschrift ger
dc.subject.ddc 620 | Ingenieurwissenschaften und Maschinenbau ger
dc.title Evaluation of common tests for fracture characterisation of advanced high-strength sheet steels with the help of the FEA
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.issn 1757-8981
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/159/1/012014
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue 1
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 159
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 12014
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken