Criteria and Indicators to Define Priority Areas for Biodiversity Conservation in Vietnam

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/12748
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/12848
dc.contributor.author Vu, Xuan Dinh
dc.contributor.author Csaplovics, Elmar
dc.contributor.author Marrs, Christopher
dc.contributor.author Nguyen, Trung Thanh
dc.date.accessioned 2022-09-08T12:03:16Z
dc.date.available 2022-09-08T12:03:16Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.citation Vu, X.; Csaplovics, E.; Marrs, C.; Nguyen, T.T.: Criteria and Indicators to Define Priority Areas for Biodiversity Conservation in Vietnam. In: Forests 13 (2022), Nr. 9, 1341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091341
dc.description.abstract Balancing biodiversity conservation with land use for agricultural production is a major societal challenge. Conservation activities must be prioritized since funds and resources for conservation are insufficient in the context of current threats, and conservation competes with other societal priorities. In order to contribute to conservation priority-setting literature, we applied an environmental model, Pressure–State–Response (PSR), to develop a set of criteria for identifying priority areas for biodiversity conservation in Vietnam. Our empirical data have been compiled from 185 respondents and categorized into three groups: Governmental Administration and Organizations, Universities and Research Institutions, and Protected Areas. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) theory was used to identify the weight of all criteria. Our results show that the priority levels for biodiversity conservation identified by these three factors are 41% for “Pressure”, 26% for “State”, and 33% for “Response”. Based on these three factors, seven criteria and seventeen indicators were developed to determine priority areas for biodiversity conservation. Besides, our study also reveals that the groups of Governmental Administration and organizations and Protected Areas put a focus on the “Pressure” factor, while the group of Universities and Research Institutions emphasized the importance of the “Response” factor in the evaluation process. We suggest that these criteria and indicators be used to identify priority areas for biodiversity conservation in Vietnam. eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Basel : MDPI
dc.relation.ispartofseries Forests 13 (2022), Nr. 9
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject analytic hierarchy process eng
dc.subject biodiversity conservation eng
dc.subject condition–pressure–response model eng
dc.subject priority areas eng
dc.subject Vietnam eng
dc.subject.ddc 630 | Landwirtschaft, Veterinärmedizin ger
dc.subject.ddc 640 | Hauswirtschaft und Familienleben ger
dc.subject.ddc 690 | Hausbau, Bauhandwerk ger
dc.title Criteria and Indicators to Define Priority Areas for Biodiversity Conservation in Vietnam
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 1999-4907
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091341
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue 9
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 13
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 1341
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken