Simulating the energy consumption of greenhouses provides significant advantages for planning
their construction or estimating the effectiveness of reconstruction measures. A substantial
number of models used today derive from a simple model by Kanthak in 1970. To this day
neither a theoretical nor a practical comparison of these developments has been conducted.
Therefore, this study aims to qualitatively and quantitatively compare four representative
models that are based on Kanthak. The best performing model is implemented into a software
program. To quantitatively compare models, a test stand was developed. The resulting
measurement box was then used to parameterize environmental variables to compare and
evaluate the models. The results from the test stand showed that models, which accounted
for cloudiness and windspeed, outperformed other models. A model developed by Tantau
and Akyazi in 2014 delivered the most accurate results. However, these model prediction
accuracies could not be reproduced under applied greenhouse conditions in the field. Here,
the model developed by Rath in 1992 showed best accuracy. This model was therefore used
as the core algorithm in the new iteration of the software system HORTEX© To increase
prediction accuracy and to enable future software development, the majority of algorithms and
functions in the original HORTEX©were restructured and replaced. The resulting software,
distributed by the Eugen Ulmer KG publisher as Hortex 5.0©, contributes to improving the
energy consumption of greenhouses.
|