Benefit–Cost Analysis of Social Media Facilitated Bystander Programs

Show simple item record

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/11589
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/11680
dc.contributor.author Ebers, Axel eng
dc.contributor.author Thomsen, Stephan L. eng
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-20T12:06:00Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-20T12:06:00Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation Ebers, A.; Thomsen, S.L.: Benefit–Cost Analysis of Social Media Facilitated Bystander Programs. In: Journal of benefit-cost analysis 12 (2021), Nr. 2, S. 367-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2020.34 eng
dc.description.abstract Bystander programs contribute to crime prevention by motivating people to intervene in violent situations. Social media allow addressing very specific target groups, and provide valuable information for program evaluation. This paper provides a conceptual framework for conducting benefit–cost analysis of bystander programs and puts a particular focus on the use of social media for program dissemination and data collection. The benefit–cost model treats publicly funded programs as investment projects and calculates the benefit–cost ratio. Program benefit arises from the damages avoided by preventing violent crime. We provide systematic instructions for estimating this benefit. The explained estimation techniques draw on social media data, machine-learning technology, randomized controlled trials and discrete choice experiments. In addition, we introduce a complementary approach with benefits calculated from the public attention generated by the program. To estimate the value of public attention, the approach uses the bid landscaping method, which originates from display advertising. The presented approaches offer the tools to implement a benefit–costs analysis in practice. The growing importance of social media for the dissemination of policy programs requires new evaluation methods. By providing two such methods, this paper contributes to evidence-based decision-making in a growing policy area. eng
dc.language.iso eng eng
dc.publisher Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of benefit-cost analysis 12 (2021), Nr. 2 eng
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported eng
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ eng
dc.subject conceptual framework eng
dc.subject benefit-cost analysis eng
dc.subject social media eng
dc.subject bystander programs eng
dc.subject machine learning eng
dc.subject discrete choice experiments eng
dc.subject.ddc 330 | Wirtschaft eng
dc.title Benefit–Cost Analysis of Social Media Facilitated Bystander Programs eng
dc.type Article eng
dc.type Text eng
dc.relation.essn 2152-2812
dc.relation.issn 2194-5888
dc.relation.doi 10.1017/bca.2020.34
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 367
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage 393
dc.description.version publishedVersion eng
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich eng


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s):

Show simple item record

 

Search the repository


Browse

My Account

Usage Statistics