Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacogenomic and Pharmacogenetic Test-Guided Personalized Therapies: A Systematic Review of the Approved Active Substances for Personalized Medicine in Germany

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/1023
dc.identifier.uri http://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/1047
dc.contributor.author Plöthner, Marika
dc.contributor.author Ribbentrop, Dana
dc.contributor.author Hartman, Jan-Phillipp
dc.contributor.author Frank, Martin
dc.date.accessioned 2017-01-12T08:11:11Z
dc.date.available 2017-01-12T08:11:11Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Plöthner, M.; Ribbentrop, D.; Hartman, J.-P.; Frank, M.: Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacogenomic and Pharmacogenetic Test-Guided Personalized Therapies: A Systematic Review of the Approved Active Substances for Personalized Medicine in Germany. In: Advances in Therapy 33 (2016), Nr. 9, S. 1461-1480. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0376-8
dc.description.abstract Background: The use of targeted therapies has recently increased. Pharmacogenetic tests are a useful tool to guide patient treatment and to test a response before administering medicines. Pharmacogenetic tests can predict potential drug resistance and may be used for determining genotype-based drug dosage. However, their cost-effectiveness as a diagnostic tool is often debatable. In Germany, 47 active ingredients are currently approved. A prior predictive test is required for 39 of these and is recommended for eight. The objective of this study was to review the cost-effectiveness (CE) of pharmacogenetic test-guided drug therapy and compare the application of drugs with and without prior genetic testing. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the CE and cost-utility of genetic tests. Studies from January 2000 until November 2015 were searched in 16 databases including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. A quality assessment of the full-text publications was performed using the validated Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument. Results: In the majority of the included studies, the pharmacogenetic test-guided therapy represents a cost-effective/cost-saving treatment option. Only seven studies lacked a clear statement of CE or cost-savings, because of uncertainty, restriction to specific patient populations, or assumptions for comparative therapy. Moreover, the high quality of the available evidence was evaluated. Conclusion: Pharmacogenetic testing constitutes an opportunity to improve the CE of pharmacotherapy. The CE of targeted therapies depends on various factors including costs, prevalence of biomarkers, and test sensitivity and specificity. To guarantee the CE comparability of stratified drug therapies, national and international standards for evaluation studies should be defined. © 2016, The Author(s). eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher New York : Springer Healthcare
dc.relation.ispartofseries Advances in Therapy 33 (2016), Nr. 9
dc.rights CC BY-NC 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject Abacavir eng
dc.subject Azathioprine eng
dc.subject Carbamazepine eng
dc.subject Cetuximab eng
dc.subject Cost-effectiveness eng
dc.subject Personalized medicine eng
dc.subject Pharmacogenetic test eng
dc.subject Targeted therapy eng
dc.subject.ddc 610 | Medizin, Gesundheit ger
dc.title Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacogenomic and Pharmacogenetic Test-Guided Personalized Therapies: A Systematic Review of the Approved Active Substances for Personalized Medicine in Germany eng
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 1865-8652
dc.relation.issn 0741-238X
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0376-8
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue 9
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 33
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 1461
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage 1480
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken