Forward variance planning and modeling of multi-variant products

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Gembarski, P.C.; Lachmayer, R.: Forward variance planning and modeling of multi-variant products. In: Procedia CIRP 21 (2014), S. 81-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.161

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/915

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 249




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
Planning multi-variant products in the early stage of the design process is still a challenge. In the present paper, a specification technique is introduced in order to define multi-variant products using degrees of freedom of shape attributes (in the following shape-DoFs) within the product structure. Our goal is to plan variety actively at the beginning of product development and not to describe variety by change of parameter values of the product's components as introduced in variant trees. Shape-DoFs are classified in the fields of shape attributes (dimension, position, shape as well as their combinations) on the one hand and mandatory or optional components on the other hand. Set up on this taxonomy graphical symbols are introduced to be used in product modeling. As application example, a welded pipe rack based upon the assembly structure modeling the product structure in this way is visualized in the first step. The second step is to translate the shape-DoFs into design parameters and identify relationships between them. The result is a parameter plan, as well as a configuration concept. Both can be seen as basis for CAD-modeling the product as design template which is the third step. In case of our example, Autodesk Inventor (without the ETO-Environment) is used to create the CAD-data. Discussing the effects of the proposed method, it will be shown that different shape-DoFs may cause various impacts in the whole product development process. Regarding these effects, scenarios can be performed in order to identify the cost and resource optimal variation possibilities of the product. In addition, it will be shown that different kinds of modularity according to PINE (e.g. cut-to-fit-modularity) can be predefined in the product model by using shape-DoFs.
License of this version: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 Unported
Document Type: Article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2014
Appears in Collections:Fakultät für Maschinenbau

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 156 62.65%
2 image of flag of United States United States 26 10.44%
3 image of flag of France France 14 5.62%
4 image of flag of China China 11 4.42%
5 image of flag of Indonesia Indonesia 9 3.61%
6 image of flag of India India 4 1.61%
7 image of flag of No geo information available No geo information available 3 1.20%
8 image of flag of Russian Federation Russian Federation 3 1.20%
9 image of flag of United Kingdom United Kingdom 3 1.20%
10 image of flag of Canada Canada 3 1.20%
    other countries 17 6.83%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse