The making of professors: Assessment and recognition in academic recruitment

Downloadstatistik des Dokuments (Auswertung nach COUNTER):

Hamann, J.: The making of professors: Assessment and recognition in academic recruitment. In: Social Studies of Science 49 (2019), Nr. 6, S. 919-941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312719880017

Version im Repositorium

Zum Zitieren der Version im Repositorium verwenden Sie bitte diesen DOI: https://doi.org/10.15488/9304

Zeitraum, für den die Download-Zahlen angezeigt werden:

Jahr: 
Monat: 

Summe der Downloads: 145




Kleine Vorschau
Zusammenfassung: 
How do academics become professors? This paper considers the making of ‘professor’ as a subject position through which academics are acknowledged in both organizational contexts and disciplinary fields. The paper examines social processes of recognition in 145 appointment procedures for professorships in the discipline of history at sixteen German universities between 1950 and 1985. Based on an analysis of over 1500 documents from archived appointment records, I investigate how academics are acknowledged as professorial in appointment procedures. The procedures invoked both (1) processes of judgement, in which worth and qualities are attributed to candidates, and (2) processes of legitimation, in which said judgements are stabilized and made acceptable. Using insights from the sociology of valuation and evaluation, this paper sheds light on the fundamental processes of recognition and valorization in academia. The findings contribute to the sociology of scientific knowledge and science and technology studies, which have concentrated on academic recognition in the realm of research, but paid less attention to such recognition in organizational contexts. Complementing this literature, the paper allows for a more general understanding of ‘professor’ as a focal academic subject position.
Lizenzbestimmungen: CC BY-NC 4.0 Unported
Publikationstyp: Article
Publikationsstatus: publishedVersion
Erstveröffentlichung: 2019
Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):Forschungszentren

Verteilung der Downloads über den gewählten Zeitraum:

Herkunft der Downloads nach Ländern:

Pos. Land Downloads
Anzahl Proz.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 81 55,86%
2 image of flag of United States United States 32 22,07%
3 image of flag of China China 6 4,14%
4 image of flag of No geo information available No geo information available 4 2,76%
5 image of flag of India India 3 2,07%
6 image of flag of Canada Canada 3 2,07%
7 image of flag of United Kingdom United Kingdom 2 1,38%
8 image of flag of Czech Republic Czech Republic 2 1,38%
9 image of flag of Philippines Philippines 1 0,69%
10 image of flag of Netherlands Netherlands 1 0,69%
    andere 10 6,90%

Weitere Download-Zahlen und Ranglisten:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.