Radiometric and geometric characteristics of pleiades images

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Jacobsen, K.; Topan, H.; Cam, A.; Özendi, M.; Oruc, M.: Radiometric and geometric characteristics of pleiades images. In: International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives 40 (2014), Nr. 1, S. 173-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-173-2014

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/885

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 98




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
Pleiades images are distributed with 50cm ground sampling distance (GSD) even if the physical resolution for nadir images is just 70cm. By theory this should influence the effective GSD determined by means of point spread function at image edges. Nevertheless by edge enhancement the effective GSD can be improved, but this should cause enlarged image noise. Again image noise can be reduced by image restoration. Finally even optimized image restoration cannot improve the image information from 70cm to 50cm without loss of details, requiring a comparison of Pleiades image details with other very high resolution space images. The image noise has been determined by analysis of the whole images for any sub-area with 5 pixels times 5 pixels. Based on the standard deviation of grey values in the small sub-areas the image noise has been determined by frequency analysis. This leads to realistic results, checked by test targets. On the other hand the visual determination of image noise based on apparently homogenous sub-areas results in too high values because the human eye is not able to identify small grey value differences - it is limited to just approximately 40 grey value steps over the available gray value range, so small difference in grey values cannot be seen, enlarging results of a manual noise determination. A tri-stereo combination of Pleiades 1A in a mountainous, but partially urban, area has been analyzed and compared with images of the same area from WorldView-1, QuickBird and IKONOS. The image restoration of the Pleiades images is very good, so the effective image resolution resulted in a factor 1.0, meaning that the effective resolution corresponds to the nominal resolution of 50cm. This does not correspond to the physical resolution of 70cm, but by edge enhancement the steepness of the grey value profile across the edge can be enlarged, reducing the width of the point spread function. Without additional filtering edge enhancement enlarges the image noise, but the average image noise of approximately 1.0 grey values related to 8bit images is very small, not indicating the edge enhancement and the down sampling of the GSD from 70cm to 50cm. So the direct comparison with the other images has to give the answer if the image quality of Pleiades images is on similar level as corresponding to the nominal resolution. As expected with the image geometry there is no problem. This is the case for all used space images in the test area, where the point identification limits the accuracy of the scene orientation.
License of this version: CC BY 3.0
Document Type: article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2014
Appears in Collections:Fakultät für Bauingenieurwesen und Geodäsie

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 49 50.00%
2 image of flag of Russian Federation Russian Federation 6 6.12%
3 image of flag of Malaysia Malaysia 6 6.12%
4 image of flag of Indonesia Indonesia 5 5.10%
5 image of flag of Austria Austria 5 5.10%
6 image of flag of United States United States 4 4.08%
7 image of flag of Peru Peru 3 3.06%
8 image of flag of France France 3 3.06%
9 image of flag of China China 2 2.04%
10 image of flag of Argentina Argentina 2 2.04%
    other countries 13 13.27%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse