We consider the problem of processing similarity queries over a set of top-k rankings where the query ranking and the similarity threshold are provided at query time. Spearman’s Footrule distance is used to compute the similarity between rankings, considering how well rankings agree on the positions (ranks) of ranked items (i.e., the L1 distance). This setup allows the application of metric index structures such as M- or BK-trees and, alternatively, enables the use of traditional inverted indices for retrieving rankings that overlap (in items) with the query. Although both techniques are reasonable, they come with individual drawbacks for our specific problem. In this paper, we propose a hybrid indexing strategy, which blends inverted indices and metric space indexing, resulting in a structure that resembles both indexing methods with tunable emphasis on one or the other. To find the sweet spot, we propose an assumption-lean but highly accurate (empirically validated) cost model through theoretical analysis. We further present optimizations to the inverted index component, for early termination and minimizing bookkeeping. The performance of the proposed algorithms, hybrid variants, and competitors is studied in a comprehensive evaluation using real-world benchmark data consisting of Web-search–result rankings and entity rankings based on Wikipedia.