Frieden, M.; Wielenberg, S.: Insolvency administrator’s incentives and the tradeoff between creditor satisfaction and efficiency in bankruptcy procedures. In: Business Research 10 (2017), Nr. 2, S. 159-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0047-x
Abstract: | |
An insolvency administrator replaces the manager of an insolvent firm to devise and organize a liquidation or reorganization plan in the creditors’ interest. In the course of the process, the insolvency administrator presents the most favourable option from his perspective, and the creditors choose to accept or reject this plan. Conflicts of interest arise because the insolvency administrator, as the better-informed party, considers in his proposal liability risks and reputational issues that are beyond the creditors’ scope. We model this conflict as a Bayesian game and find that, under those compensation schemes typically used in real-world regulations, optimal creditor satisfaction and efficient decisions concerning the economic future of the insolvent firm will never be achieved simultaneously. | |
License of this version: | CC BY 4.0 Unported |
Document Type: | Article |
Publishing status: | publishedVersion |
Issue Date: | 2017 |
Appears in Collections: | Philosophische Fakultät |
pos. | country | downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
total | perc. | |||
1 | Germany | 20 | 31.75% | |
2 | United States | 19 | 30.16% | |
3 | China | 5 | 7.94% | |
4 | No geo information available | 4 | 6.35% | |
5 | Russian Federation | 2 | 3.17% | |
6 | Poland | 2 | 3.17% | |
7 | France | 2 | 3.17% | |
8 | Cyprus | 2 | 3.17% | |
9 | South Africa | 1 | 1.59% | |
10 | Spain | 1 | 1.59% | |
other countries | 5 | 7.94% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.