Richard Rorty e a "agenda pós": críticas, interpretações, redescrições

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Quintão de Almeida, Felipe; Fernandez Vaz, Alexandre: Richard Rorty e a "agenda pós": críticas, interpretações, redescrições. In: Educational Review 27 (2011), Nr. 1, S. 295-324. DOI:

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier:

Selected time period:


Sum total of downloads: 14

This article analyzes the reception of Richard Rorty's work in the field of education, focusing on the description carried out by the Brazilian Marxist pedagogy. It presents, in such context, the uses of Hungarian Philosopher Georg Lukacs and his late partner Roy Bhaskar, an Indian Intellectual who has been living in England for a long time, by the Marxist pedagogy as possibilities of opposing the presence of Rorty in the production of knowledge in education. It analyzes whether the criticisms addressed to Rorty (Anti-enlightenment, Irrationality, Ontological Relativism, Epistemic Fallacy, Empiricism etc.) can be maintained when confronted to another reading of his work, our own reading. The redescription indicates the limits and shortcomings of the description to which it makes opposition.
License of this version: CC BY-NC 4.0 Unported
Document Type: article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2011
Appears in Collections:Philosophische Fakultät

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 12 85.71%
2 image of flag of Argentina Argentina 2 14.29%

Further download figures and rankings:


Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository