Analyzing Cultural Markers to Characterize Regional Identity for Rural Planning

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Knaps, Falco; Herrmann, Sylvia: Analyzing Cultural Markers to Characterize Regional Identity for Rural Planning. In: Rural Landscapes: Society, Environment, History 5 (2018), Nr. 1, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/rl.41

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/5165

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 461




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
Regional identity is the shared sense of regional ‘one-ness’, distinctiveness and difference. However, it is an undervalued factor to promote development in lagging rural areas and little is known about methods to reveal its content. This paper aims to develop and apply a method to explore regional identity in rural areas. We argue that the most important cultural markers – understood as rural landscapes and heritage features, perceived as regional identity reference points – can be analyzed and used to characterize regional identity. To this end, a case study was undertaken in two rural areas in northern Germany. We conducted 55 semi-structured interviews and determined cultural markers, using a new procedure with different analysis stages (identification, collectivity, historical depth, relationships). Results revealed a broad spectrum of cultural markers exhibiting collective significance with respect to landscape, built structures, history, intangible heritage and land-use. Next to traditional cultural markers, we found modern ones, introduced after the Second World War. Partially, traditional and modern cultural markers were perceived as related. Based on this knowledge, a first characterization of both regional identities was conducted, showing differences between our study areas. While one regional identity appears to be fragmented, conflicting and influenced by modern cultural markers, the other was characterized as coherent and rooted in traditional cultural markers. However, the integration of these characterizations into further planning steps remains challenging and needs additional, regionally adapted methods. A key finding of the study is that there is no single standard method for linking regional identity and rural planning.
License of this version: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Document Type: Article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2018
Appears in Collections:Fakultät für Architektur und Landschaft

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 117 25.38%
2 image of flag of United States United States 59 12.80%
3 image of flag of China China 54 11.71%
4 image of flag of United Kingdom United Kingdom 18 3.90%
5 image of flag of Netherlands Netherlands 16 3.47%
6 image of flag of Australia Australia 15 3.25%
7 image of flag of No geo information available No geo information available 11 2.39%
8 image of flag of Singapore Singapore 10 2.17%
9 image of flag of Hong Kong Hong Kong 10 2.17%
10 image of flag of Czech Republic Czech Republic 10 2.17%
    other countries 141 30.59%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse