Consistency and impact of mixed receiver antenna phase centre models in regional GNSS networks

Downloadstatistik des Dokuments (Auswertung nach COUNTER):

Kersten, T.; Kröger, J.; Breva, Y.; Schön, S.: Consistency and impact of mixed receiver antenna phase centre models in regional GNSS networks. Presentation at Euref Symposium 2019, May 22-24, Tallinn, Estonia.

Version im Repositorium

Zum Zitieren der Version im Repositorium verwenden Sie bitte diesen DOI: https://doi.org/10.15488/4852

Zeitraum, für den die Download-Zahlen angezeigt werden:

Jahr: 
Monat: 

Summe der Downloads: 210




Kleine Vorschau
Zusammenfassung: 
The Institut für Erdmessung (IfE) at the Leibniz University Hannover calibrates GNSS antennas determined by the well known robot based concept in the field. Our group has recently improved the calibration procedure to support absolute receiver antenna calibrations for all GNSS frequencies (GPS L1/L2/L5, GLONASS L1/L2 and Galileo E1/E5). To fully use the advantage of multi GNSS processing capabilities for absolute and relative precise positioning, accurate and consistent receiver antenna calibration patterns of ground stations are required. Currently, in IGS and EPN they are available by chamber calibration method for some antennas. However, systematic and sometimes significant differences exist between both approaches (field robot and chamber) that have to be studied in detail to identify the causes and to fix these issues.In this contribution, we present first robot based multi GNSS patterns from IfE. Furthermore, a study is performed, to show the impact from the observation domain (differences of antenna phase centre patterns) to the parameter domain (position, troposphere, ambiguities). In this study, we used reference stations from the EPN network which provide individual antenna patterns obtained from both approaches (field robot and chamber). Baselines of lengths ranging from 150-600km and one of 1670km are analysed. We found that on the one hand, differences between both pattern sets do not met the proposed "1mm-rule-of-thumb" in the most of studied cases. On the other hand, we show that in cases of consistent antenna pattern sets no significant differences in the parameter domain are obtained. However, mixing patterns from different approaches implies deviations of up to 1cm (in one case up to 2cm) mostly in the topocentric up component. These differences are directly aligned to the differences in the antenna pattern.
Lizenzbestimmungen: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 DE
Publikationstyp: ConferenceObject
Publikationsstatus: publishedVersion
Erstveröffentlichung: 2019
Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):Fakultät für Bauingenieurwesen und Geodäsie

Verteilung der Downloads über den gewählten Zeitraum:

Herkunft der Downloads nach Ländern:

Pos. Land Downloads
Anzahl Proz.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 98 46,67%
2 image of flag of China China 40 19,05%
3 image of flag of United States United States 21 10,00%
4 image of flag of United Kingdom United Kingdom 7 3,33%
5 image of flag of No geo information available No geo information available 6 2,86%
6 image of flag of Estonia Estonia 6 2,86%
7 image of flag of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of 5 2,38%
8 image of flag of Portugal Portugal 4 1,90%
9 image of flag of Turkey Turkey 3 1,43%
10 image of flag of Italy Italy 3 1,43%
    andere 17 8,10%

Weitere Download-Zahlen und Ranglisten:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.