Schrader, Jan Simon: Essays on the development of a theory of strategy formation in hospitals. Hannover : Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität, Diss., 2019, 158 S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15488/4781
Abstract: | |
Hospitals experienced far-reaching changes over the past decades. A new market-driven economic environment leads to an intensified competition on the hospital market and challengesthe traditional understanding of the strategy formation process. Given that strategic decisions must meet economic and medical demands, strategic issues cannot longer be solely developed and processed by management professionals. Instead, successful strategy formation also depends on the development and processing of unintended strategic issues generated through the expertise of medical professionals. Consequently, manager’s competence and medical expertise have to be connected to capitalize on their mutually exclusive knowledge. In sum, the literature is unambiguous in that hospitals represent complex organizations in which the simultaneous processing of intended strategic issues from the board of executives and unintended strategic issues from medical professionals is of utmost importance. However, empirical evidence on strategy formation as a collaboration between management and medical professionals is scarce and theory of strategy formation in hospitals is poor. The aim of this doctoral thesis is to address these research gaps by developing a theory of strategy formation in hospitals, thereby understanding how and why strategic issues are processed and integrated into the strategic agenda. | |
License of this version: | Es gilt deutsches Urheberrecht. Das Dokument darf zum eigenen Gebrauch kostenfrei genutzt, aber nicht im Internet bereitgestellt oder an Außenstehende weitergegeben werden. |
Document Type: | DoctoralThesis |
Publishing status: | publishedVersion |
Issue Date: | 2019 |
Appears in Collections: | Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät Dissertationen |
pos. | country | downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
total | perc. | |||
1 | Germany | 248 | 64.75% | |
2 | United States | 38 | 9.92% | |
3 | China | 12 | 3.13% | |
4 | Russian Federation | 9 | 2.35% | |
5 | Brazil | 9 | 2.35% | |
6 | Netherlands | 7 | 1.83% | |
7 | United Kingdom | 7 | 1.83% | |
8 | Ukraine | 6 | 1.57% | |
9 | India | 4 | 1.04% | |
10 | Australia | 4 | 1.04% | |
other countries | 39 | 10.18% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.