Wendlandt, M.; Schrader, U.: Consumer reactance against loyalty programs. In: Journal of Consumer Marketing 24 (2007), Nr. 5, S. 293-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760710773111
Abstract: | |
Purpose - Although relationship marketing has developed into the prevailing marketing paradigm, it frequently encounters resistance from the demand side. Both management practitioners and academics indicate that at least some consumers show reactance against loyalty programs, i.e. against tactical instruments of relationship marketing. Nevertheless, relationship marketing has widely neglected reactance theory. This paper attempts to close this gap. Design/methodology/approach - Based on the fundamental principles of loyalty programs and reactance theory the paper presents a set of hypotheses on the determinants and effects of situational consumer reactance against loyalty programs. It tests these hypotheses on the basis of 388 face-to-face interviews with bookstore customers. These interviews include a between-subject manipulation on the reactance effect of economic, social-psychological, and contractual bonding potentials. To test the proposed hypotheses, the paper applies structural equation modeling with PLS. Findings - As expected, contractual bonds provoked reactance effects, while social-psychological bonds neither increased reactance, nor the perceived utility of the program. Economic bonds raised perceived utility up to a certain threshold level, from which the reactance effect dominated thereafter. Practical implications - As a consequence, a cautious and limited application of customer loyalty programs is advisable. The developed consumer reactance scale can help managers to evaluate the effects of planned or implemented customer retention measures. Originality/value - This is the first attempt to investigate situational reactance in a loyalty program setting. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited. | |
License of this version: | Es gilt deutsches Urheberrecht. Das Dokument darf zum eigenen Gebrauch kostenfrei genutzt, aber nicht im Internet bereitgestellt oder an Außenstehende weitergegeben werden. Dieser Beitrag ist aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich. |
Document Type: | Article |
Publishing status: | publishedVersion |
Issue Date: | 2007 |
Appears in Collections: | Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät |
pos. | country | downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
total | perc. | |||
1 | ![]() |
Germany | 276 | 22.73% |
2 | ![]() |
United States | 254 | 20.92% |
3 | ![]() |
United Kingdom | 104 | 8.57% |
4 | ![]() |
India | 61 | 5.02% |
5 | ![]() |
Netherlands | 40 | 3.29% |
6 | ![]() |
South Africa | 36 | 2.97% |
7 | ![]() |
China | 33 | 2.72% |
8 | ![]() |
Australia | 30 | 2.47% |
9 | ![]() |
France | 25 | 2.06% |
10 | ![]() |
Austria | 25 | 2.06% |
other countries | 330 | 27.18% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.