Patelli, E.; Govers, Y.; Broggi, M.; Gomes, H.M.; Link, M.; Mottershead, J.E.: Sensitivity or Bayesian model updating: a comparison of techniques using the DLR AIRMOD test data. In: Archive of Applied Mechanics 87 (2017), Nr. 5, S. 905-925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-017-1233-1
Zusammenfassung: | |
Deterministic model updating is now a mature technology widely applied to large-scale industrial structures. It is concerned with the calibration of the parameters of a single model based on one set of test data. It is, of course, well known that different analysts produce different finite element models, make different physics-based assumptions, and parameterize their models differently. Also, tests carried out on the same structure, by different operatives, at different times, under different ambient conditions produce different results. There is no unique model and no unique data. Therefore, model updating needs to take account of modeling and test-data variability. Much emphasis is now placed on what has become known as stochastic model updating where data are available from multiple nominally identical test structures. In this paper two currently prominent stochastic model updating techniques (sensitivity-based updating and Bayesian model updating) are described and applied to the DLR AIRMOD structure. | |
Lizenzbestimmungen: | CC BY 4.0 Unported |
Publikationstyp: | Article |
Publikationsstatus: | publishedVersion |
Erstveröffentlichung: | 2017 |
Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en): | Fakultät für Bauingenieurwesen und Geodäsie |
Pos. | Land | Downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Anzahl | Proz. | |||
1 | Germany | 136 | 53,97% | |
2 | United States | 41 | 16,27% | |
3 | China | 11 | 4,37% | |
4 | No geo information available | 8 | 3,17% | |
5 | Japan | 7 | 2,78% | |
6 | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 7 | 2,78% | |
7 | India | 5 | 1,98% | |
8 | Norway | 4 | 1,59% | |
9 | Turkey | 3 | 1,19% | |
10 | Egypt | 2 | 0,79% | |
andere | 28 | 11,11% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.