Timing-specific effects of single-session M1 anodal tDCS on motor sequence retention in healthy older adults

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Puri, R.; Hinder, M.R.; Krüger, M.; Summers, J.J.: Timing-specific effects of single-session M1 anodal tDCS on motor sequence retention in healthy older adults. In: Neuroimage: Reports 1 (2021), Nr. 1, 100009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynirp.2021.100009

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/15722

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 14




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may assist in counteracting age-related decline in cognitive and motor functions. The current study investigated the potential impact of anodal tDCS, and the timing of its application, in mitigating age-related deficits in motor sequence learning. Forty-eight healthy older adults received, over the primary motor cortex (M1), tDCS – anodal and sham at least 1 week apart – before, during or after an explicit sequence-learning task with electrophysiological measures of corticospinal excitability (CSE) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) also obtained. Bayesian analyses revealed no generalised benefit of anodal tDCS to motor acquisition and immediate retention. Furthermore, there was not enough evidence to support timing-specific stimulation differences on performance during acquisition and immediate retention. However, performance at delayed retention – measured 24 ​h after acquisition – was worse in the anodal (13.1%) than sham (17.6%) tDCS session for the group receiving tDCS during sequence acquisition, but not before (anodal: 18.4%; sham: 16.7%) or after (anodal: 18.5%; sham: 16.3%) it. No corresponding task-specific stimulation-based changes in CSE and SICI were observed. Thus, single-session M1 anodal tDCS in healthy older adults not only proved ineffective in facilitating sequence acquisition and immediate retention but also, when administered during sequence learning, proved detrimental to delayed retention. Overall, these null and negative results may have implications for the use of tDCS in clinical and rehabilitative settings, especially in the elderly.
License of this version: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Document Type: Article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2021
Appears in Collections:Philosophische Fakultät

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of United States United States 4 28.57%
2 image of flag of Germany Germany 4 28.57%
3 image of flag of Austria Austria 2 14.29%
4 image of flag of Israel Israel 1 7.14%
5 image of flag of Indonesia Indonesia 1 7.14%
6 image of flag of United Kingdom United Kingdom 1 7.14%
7 image of flag of Australia Australia 1 7.14%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse