Adoption and Income Effects of Public GAP Standards: Evidence from the Horticultural Sector in Thailand

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Krause, Henning; Lippe, Rattiya; Grote, Ulrike: Adoption and Income Effects of Public GAP Standards: Evidence from the Horticultural Sector in Thailand. In: Horticulturae 2 (2016), Nr. 4, 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae2040018

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/1550

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 56




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
To reduce potential food hazards and increase the image of Thai horticultural products abroad, the Thai government introduced public standards of Good Agricultural Practices (Q-GAP). What makes orchid and mango producers in Thailand adopt Q-GAP standards and how do these affect their income and export shares? Primary data from 400 certified and non-certified orchid and mango producers was collected from main exporting provinces in Thailand. The binary probit model estimations show that it is the orchid and mango producers with higher education, and more physical and social capital who tend to comply with Q-GAP standards. Results from the Propensity Score Matching approach reveal that adoption of public GAP standards results in positive income effects for mango producers, but not for orchid producers. This can be explained by the fact that certified mango producers can sell their products to high-value retail chains which offer higher prices for their products, while certified and non-certified orchid producers cooperate with traders from the same value chain.
License of this version: CC BY 4.0
Document Type: article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2016
Appears in Collections:Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 49 87.50%
2 image of flag of United States United States 3 5.36%
3 image of flag of Tanzania, United Republic of Tanzania, United Republic of 2 3.57%
4 image of flag of Russian Federation Russian Federation 2 3.57%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse