Comparing different search methods for the open access journal recommendation tool B!SON

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Entrup, E.; Eppelin, E.; Ewerth, E.; Tullney, M.; Hoppe, A. et al.: Comparing different search methods for the open access journal recommendation tool B!SON. In: International Journal on Digital Libraries (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-023-00372-3

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/14445

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 98




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
Finding a suitable open access journal to publish academic work is a complex task: Researchers have to navigate a constantly growing number of journals, institutional agreements with publishers, funders’ conditions and the risk of predatory publishers. To help with these challenges, we introduce a web-based journal recommendation system called B!SON. A systematic requirements analysis was conducted in the form of a survey. The developed tool suggests open access journals based on title, abstract and references provided by the user. The recommendations are built on open data, publisher-independent and work across domains and languages. Transparency is provided by its open source nature, an open application programming interface (API) and by specifying which matches the shown recommendations are based on. The recommendation quality has been evaluated using two different evaluation techniques, including several new recommendation methods. We were able to improve the results from our previous paper with a pre-trained transformer model. The beta version of the tool received positive feedback from the community and in several test sessions. We developed a recommendation system for open access journals to help researchers find a suitable journal. The open tool has been extensively tested, and we found possible improvements for our current recommendation technique. Development by two German academic libraries ensures the longevity and sustainability of the system.
License of this version: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Document Type: Article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2023-07-20
Appears in Collections:Zentrale Einrichtungen

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 63 64.29%
2 image of flag of United States United States 16 16.33%
3 image of flag of China China 5 5.10%
4 image of flag of Netherlands Netherlands 3 3.06%
5 image of flag of Romania Romania 2 2.04%
6 image of flag of Korea, Republic of Korea, Republic of 2 2.04%
7 image of flag of United Kingdom United Kingdom 2 2.04%
8 image of flag of Vietnam Vietnam 1 1.02%
9 image of flag of Hong Kong Hong Kong 1 1.02%
10 image of flag of France France 1 1.02%
    other countries 2 2.04%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse