Keller, L.; Cortina, K.S.; Müller, K.; Miller, K.F.: Noticing and weighing alternatives in the reflection of regular classroom teaching: Evidence of expertise using mobile eye-tracking. In: Instructional Science 50 (2022), S. 251-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09570-5
Abstract: | |
Instructional videos are widely used to study teachers’ professional vision. A new technological development in video research is mobile eye-tracking (MET). It has the potential to provide fine-grained insights into teachers’ professional vision in action, but has yet been scarcely employed. We addressed this research gap by using MET video feedback to examine how expert and novice teachers differed in their noticing and weighing of alternative teaching strategies. Expert and novice teachers’ lessons were recorded with MET devices. Then, they commented on what they observe while watching their own teaching videos. Using a mixed methods approach, we found that expert and novice teachers did not differ in the number of classroom events they noticed and alternative teaching strategies they mentioned. However, novice teachers were more critical of their own teaching than expert teachers, particularly when they considered alternative teaching strategies. Practical implications for the field of teacher education are discussed. © 2021, The Author(s). | |
License of this version: | CC BY 4.0 Unported |
Document Type: | Article |
Publishing status: | publishedVersion |
Issue Date: | 2022 |
Appears in Collections: | Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät |
pos. | country | downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
total | perc. | |||
1 | ![]() |
Germany | 33 | 55.93% |
2 | ![]() |
United States | 13 | 22.03% |
3 | ![]() |
China | 4 | 6.78% |
4 | ![]() |
Switzerland | 2 | 3.39% |
5 | ![]() |
Taiwan | 1 | 1.69% |
6 | ![]() |
Sweden | 1 | 1.69% |
7 | ![]() |
Russian Federation | 1 | 1.69% |
8 | ![]() |
Netherlands | 1 | 1.69% |
9 | ![]() |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1.69% |
10 | ![]() |
Ireland | 1 | 1.69% |
other countries | 1 | 1.69% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.