Planungskultur – auf der Suche nach einem kontemporären Verständnis räumlicher Planung? [Planning Culture – In Search of a Contemporary Understanding of Spatial Planning?]

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Levin-Keitel, M.; Othengrafen, F.: Planungskultur – auf der Suche nach einem kontemporären Verständnis räumlicher Planung? In: DISP 52 (2016), Nr. 4, S. 76-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2016.1273672

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/1219

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 74




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
This article critically examines the recently introduced and hotly debated conceptual approach of planning cultures. While most scientific papers and studies try to focus on the advantages and forces of planning culture as an analytical approach, this article concentrates more generally on the scientific discourse on planning cultures, i.e. with which intentions the concept has evolved, how it differs from other planning theories, and if the concept has achieved the expected results. By analyzing the original idea of the concept and addressing the complex relationships between culture – including the specific socioeconomic patterns and related cultural norms, values, traditions, and attitudes – and spatial planning as an operative instrument of territorial policy, both the potentials and shortcomings of planning culture are presented and discussed. It is evident that planning culture as a concept allows us to place specific developments, planning routines and principles in direct correlation with each other, offering a new and culturally influenced perspective on the analysis of planning practices. At the same time, it also becomes apparent that the concept is still unclear and faces challenges with regard to its adaptation for empirical research. The main reasons for this might be found in the omnipresence of culture, the static focus of planning culture research, and methodological issues preventing the application of the various models for practical research. The article then concludes in how far the analysis of planning cultures is able to contribute to a contemporary understanding of planning practices and routines, and how research on planning cultures can be improved. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in disP - The Planning Review on 2017-01-09, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02513625.2016.1273672.
License of this version: Es gilt deutsches Urheberrecht. Das Dokument darf zum eigenen Gebrauch kostenfrei genutzt, aber nicht im Internet bereitgestellt oder an Außenstehende weitergegeben werden.
Document Type: Text
Publishing status: acceptedVersion
Issue Date: 2016
Appears in Collections:Fakultät für Architektur und Landschaft

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 70 94.59%
2 image of flag of Brazil Brazil 2 2.70%
3 image of flag of Czech Republic Czech Republic 1 1.35%
4 image of flag of Switzerland Switzerland 1 1.35%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse