Hansmeier, H.; Schiller, K.; Rogge, K.S.: Towards methodological diversity in sustainability transitions research? Comparing recent developments (2016-2019) with the past (before 2016). In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 38 (2021), S. 169-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.01.001
Zusammenfassung: | |
The sustainability transitions research field continues to broaden rapidly, engaging scholars from a wide variety of disciplinary backgrounds. As highlighted in the STRN research agenda, transitions research relies on a broad range of methodological approaches; yet the methodological diversity of transitions studies has remained somewhat limited. In this article, we investigate if this verdict still applies to transition studies published since 2016. While our findings suggest that the recent literature became methodologically more diverse especially with regard to theoretical frameworks and research questions, other methodological dimensions continue to suggest a lack of diversity. Based on our literature review we propose three particularly promising areas for further diversifying future research on socio-technical transitions towards sustainability: theoretical bridging, novel methods, and multi-scalarity across multiple sectors. © 2021 | |
Lizenzbestimmungen: | CC BY 4.0 Unported |
Publikationstyp: | Article |
Publikationsstatus: | publishedVersion |
Erstveröffentlichung: | 2021 |
Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en): | Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät |
Pos. | Land | Downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Anzahl | Proz. | |||
1 | Germany | 37 | 58,73% | |
2 | United States | 15 | 23,81% | |
3 | China | 4 | 6,35% | |
4 | Vietnam | 2 | 3,17% | |
5 | Indonesia | 2 | 3,17% | |
6 | South Africa | 1 | 1,59% | |
7 | Taiwan | 1 | 1,59% | |
8 | Peru | 1 | 1,59% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.