Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study

Downloadstatistik des Dokuments (Auswertung nach COUNTER):

Ludwig, K.; Schulenburg, J.-M.Graf von der; Greiner, W.: Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study. In: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 15 (2017), Nr. 1, 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0617-9

Version im Repositorium

Zum Zitieren der Version im Repositorium verwenden Sie bitte diesen DOI: https://doi.org/10.15488/1205

Zeitraum, für den die Download-Zahlen angezeigt werden:

Jahr: 
Monat: 

Summe der Downloads: 204




Kleine Vorschau
Zusammenfassung: 
Background: The EuroQol Group has extended the severity levels of the EQ-5D from three to five (EQ-5D-5L). There are valuation studies worldwide planned in order to convert the EQ-5D-5L health states into a single preference-based summary score based on country-specific value sets of social health status preference valuations. The EuroQol Group developed an internationally standardised EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. Based on the experiences of the first wave of valuation studies applying the protocol, a number of modifications to the implementation of composite time trade-off (cTTO) were proposed and tested in an exploratory study in Germany. Methods: The aim of the study is to test the improved EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol 1.1 and the implementation of three modifications: (1) introduction of ranking task, (2) separating time trade-off (TTO) tasks for health states "Better Than Dead"(BTD)/"Worse Than Dead" (WTD), (3) allow for removal of problematic valuations from the cTTO data (the feedback module). Data were collected in computer assisted personal interviews with 200 members of the German general public. Results: In comparison to the first wave of valuation studies a higher data quality can be observed in both study arms: increasing number of WTD valuations, reduced inconsistencies for health state 55555 as well as higher values for mild health states. Comparing both study arms, mean observed cTTO value for severity 6 is higher in the test arm. The proportion of inconsistent cTTO responses is lower in the test arm than in the control arm and is further reduced by the feedback module. The ranking task prolongs the interview without the desired effect. Conclusions: Both study arms yielded higher data quality in comparison to the first wave of EQ-5D-5L valuation studies. The valuation protocol combined with an intensive interviewer training and close data monitoring showed a high feasibility and acceptability to the respondents of the general population as well as the interviewers in Germany. Based on the results of this study and other countries, the separation of TTO tasks for health states BTD/WTD and the feedback module will be implemented in the valuation study for the EQ-5D-5L for Germany.
Lizenzbestimmungen: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Publikationstyp: Article
Erstveröffentlichung: 2017
Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät

Verteilung der Downloads über den gewählten Zeitraum:

Herkunft der Downloads nach Ländern:

Pos. Land Downloads
Anzahl Proz.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 157 76,96%
2 image of flag of United States United States 19 9,31%
3 image of flag of China China 5 2,45%
4 image of flag of No geo information available No geo information available 3 1,47%
5 image of flag of Russian Federation Russian Federation 3 1,47%
6 image of flag of Indonesia Indonesia 3 1,47%
7 image of flag of Hungary Hungary 1 0,49%
8 image of flag of France France 1 0,49%
9 image of flag of Denmark Denmark 1 0,49%
10 image of flag of Albania Albania 1 0,49%
    andere 10 4,90%

Weitere Download-Zahlen und Ranglisten:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.