GIS and land cover-based assessment of ecosystem services in the North Karelia Biosphere Reserve, Finland

Downloadstatistik des Dokuments (Auswertung nach COUNTER):

Poikolainen, L.; Pinto, G.; Vihervaara, P.; Burkhard B.; Wolff, F. et al.: GIS and land cover-based assessment of ecosystem services in the North Karelia Biosphere Reserve, Finland. In: Fennia - International Journal of Geography 197 (2019), Nr. 2, S. 249–267. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11143/fennia.80331

Version im Repositorium

Zum Zitieren der Version im Repositorium verwenden Sie bitte diesen DOI: https://doi.org/10.15488/11168

Zeitraum, für den die Download-Zahlen angezeigt werden:

Jahr: 
Monat: 

Summe der Downloads: 223




Kleine Vorschau
Zusammenfassung: 
Conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, ecosystems and their services are key principles behind the establishment of “Biosphere Reserves”. Mapping of ecosystem services is one of the activities that is expected to increase the knowledge of sustainable land use planning. The Biosphere Reserves, established by the UNESCO Man and Biosphere Programme, aims to find the balance between nature conservation, use of natural resources, recreation and other culture-related activities. For this purpose, the ecosystem services approach is a promising tool for examining the relationships between people and nature in practice. This study applies the ecosystem services approach and examines which ecosystem services are perceived to be relevant in the North Karelia Biosphere Reserve in Eastern Finland. The results of a matrix method, with expert-based approach, showed that particularly old-growth forests and undrained open and forested mires have a broader potential to provide different ecosystem services. Water and urban areas are considered important for cultural services. However, these areas cover only a relatively small area altogether. The results of the ecosystem services assessment were compared to areas of high biodiversity, as defined by local biodiversity experts. The areas with high capacity for ecosystem services provision (from now on “high ecosystem services areas”) were found in areas with high biodiversity. In most cases, these areas are already under protection. The results also showed that ambiguity is an issue with the use of the ecosystem services concept in both stakeholder and expert evaluations.
Lizenzbestimmungen: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Publikationstyp: Article
Publikationsstatus: publishedVersion
Erstveröffentlichung: 2019-11
Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):Fakultät für Bauingenieurwesen und Geodäsie

Verteilung der Downloads über den gewählten Zeitraum:

Herkunft der Downloads nach Ländern:

Pos. Land Downloads
Anzahl Proz.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 56 25,11%
2 image of flag of United States United States 40 17,94%
3 image of flag of Finland Finland 24 10,76%
4 image of flag of Korea, Republic of Korea, Republic of 9 4,04%
5 image of flag of No geo information available No geo information available 6 2,69%
6 image of flag of China China 6 2,69%
7 image of flag of Canada Canada 6 2,69%
8 image of flag of Italy Italy 5 2,24%
9 image of flag of Lithuania Lithuania 4 1,79%
10 image of flag of United Kingdom United Kingdom 4 1,79%
    andere 63 28,25%

Weitere Download-Zahlen und Ranglisten:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.