Assessing land use and flood management impacts on ecosystem services in a river landscape (Upper Danube, Germany)

Downloadstatistik des Dokuments (Auswertung nach COUNTER):

Stammel, B.; Fischer, C.; Cyffka, B.; Albert, C.; Damm, C. et al.: Assessing land use and flood management impacts on ecosystem services in a river landscape (Upper Danube, Germany). In: River Research and Applications 37 (2020), Nr. 2, S. 209220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3669

Version im Repositorium

Zum Zitieren der Version im Repositorium verwenden Sie bitte diesen DOI: https://doi.org/10.15488/11031

Zeitraum, für den die Download-Zahlen angezeigt werden:

Jahr: 
Monat: 

Summe der Downloads: 138




Kleine Vorschau
Zusammenfassung: 
Rivers and floodplains provide many regulating, provisioning and cultural ecosystem services (ES) such as flood risk regulation, crop production or recreation. Intensive use of resources such as hydropower production, construction of detention basins and intensive agriculture substantially change ecosystems and may affect their capacity to provide ES. Legal frameworks such as the European Water Framework Directive, Bird and Habitats Directive and Floods Directive already address various uses and interests. However, management is still sectoral and often potential synergies or trade-offs between sectors are not considered. The ES concept could support a joint and holistic evaluation of impacts and proactively suggest advantageous options. The river ecosystem service index (RESI) method evaluates the capacity of floodplains to provide ES by using a standardized five-point scale for 1 km-floodplain segments based on available spatial data. This scaling allows consistent scoring of all ES and their integration into a single index. The aim of this article is to assess ES impacts of different flood prevention scenarios on a 75 km section of the Danube river corridor in Germany. The RESI method was applied to evaluate scenario effects on 13 ES with the standardized five-point scale. Synergies and trade-offs were identified as well as ES bundles and dependencies on land use and connectivity. The ratio of actual and former floodplain has the strongest influence on the total ES provision: the higher the percentage and area of an active floodplain, the higher the sum of ES. The RESI method proved useful to support decision-making in regional planning. © 2020 The Authors. River Research and Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Lizenzbestimmungen: CC BY-NC 4.0 Unported
Publikationstyp: Article
Publikationsstatus: publishedVersion
Erstveröffentlichung: 2020
Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):Fakultät für Architektur und Landschaft

Verteilung der Downloads über den gewählten Zeitraum:

Herkunft der Downloads nach Ländern:

Pos. Land Downloads
Anzahl Proz.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 54 39,13%
2 image of flag of United States United States 26 18,84%
3 image of flag of No geo information available No geo information available 11 7,97%
4 image of flag of China China 10 7,25%
5 image of flag of Indonesia Indonesia 6 4,35%
6 image of flag of United Kingdom United Kingdom 6 4,35%
7 image of flag of Russian Federation Russian Federation 4 2,90%
8 image of flag of Netherlands Netherlands 3 2,17%
9 image of flag of Switzerland Switzerland 3 2,17%
10 image of flag of Czech Republic Czech Republic 2 1,45%
    andere 13 9,42%

Weitere Download-Zahlen und Ranglisten:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.