Evaluation of semantic segmentation methods for deforestation detection in the amazon

Downloadstatistik des Dokuments (Auswertung nach COUNTER):

Andrade, R.B.; Costa, G.A.O.P.; Mota, G.L.A.; Ortega, M.X.; Feitosa, R.Q. et al.: Evaluation of semantic segmentation methods for deforestation detection in the amazon. In: Paparoditis, N. et al. (Eds.): XXIV ISPRS Congress, Commission III : edition 2020. Katlenburg-Lindau : Copernicus Publications, 2020. (ISPRS Archives ; 43,B3), S. 1497-1505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-1497-2020

Version im Repositorium

Zum Zitieren der Version im Repositorium verwenden Sie bitte diesen DOI: https://doi.org/10.15488/10818

Zeitraum, für den die Download-Zahlen angezeigt werden:

Jahr: 
Monat: 

Summe der Downloads: 541




Kleine Vorschau
Zusammenfassung: 
Deforestation is a wide-reaching problem, responsible for serious environmental issues, such as biodiversity loss and global climate change. Containing approximately ten percent of all biomass on the planet and home to one tenth of the known species, the Amazon biome has faced important deforestation pressure in the last decades. Devising efficient deforestation detection methods is, therefore, key to combat illegal deforestation and to aid in the conception of public policies directed to promote sustainable development in the Amazon. In this work, we implement and evaluate a deforestation detection approach which is based on a Fully Convolutional, Deep Learning (DL) model: the DeepLabv3+. We compare the results obtained with the devised approach to those obtained with previously proposed DL-based methods (Early Fusion and Siamese Convolutional Network) using Landsat OLI-8 images acquired at different dates, covering a region of the Amazon forest. In order to evaluate the sensitivity of the methods to the amount of training data, we also evaluate them using varying training sample set sizes. The results show that all tested variants of the proposed method significantly outperform the other DL-based methods in terms of overall accuracy and F1-score. The gains in performance were even more substantial when limited amounts of samples were used in training the evaluated methods. © 2020 International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives.
Lizenzbestimmungen: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Publikationstyp: BookPart
Publikationsstatus: publishedVersion
Erstveröffentlichung: 2020
Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):Fakultät für Bauingenieurwesen und Geodäsie

Verteilung der Downloads über den gewählten Zeitraum:

Herkunft der Downloads nach Ländern:

Pos. Land Downloads
Anzahl Proz.
1 image of flag of United States United States 95 17,56%
2 image of flag of India India 57 10,54%
3 image of flag of Brazil Brazil 44 8,13%
4 image of flag of United Kingdom United Kingdom 35 6,47%
5 image of flag of Germany Germany 34 6,28%
6 image of flag of China China 23 4,25%
7 image of flag of France France 18 3,33%
8 image of flag of No geo information available No geo information available 16 2,96%
9 image of flag of Colombia Colombia 15 2,77%
10 image of flag of Italy Italy 14 2,59%
    andere 190 35,12%

Weitere Download-Zahlen und Ranglisten:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.