Deep-learning continuous gravitational waves : Multiple detectors and realistic noise

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Dreissigacker, C.; Prix, R.: Deep-learning continuous gravitational waves: Multiple detectors and realistic noise. In: Physical Review D 102 (2020), Nr. 2, 22005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.022005

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/10646

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 69




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
The sensitivity of wide-parameter-space searches for continuous gravitational waves is limited by computational cost. Recently it was shown that deep neural networks (DNNs) can perform all-sky searches directly on (single-detector) strain data [C. Dreissigacker, Phys. Rev. D 100, 044009 (2019)PRVDAQ2470-001010.1103/PhysRevD.100.044009], potentially providing a low-computing-cost search method that could lead to a better overall sensitivity. Here we expand on this study in two respects: (i) using (simulated) strain data from two detectors simultaneously, and (ii) training for directed (i.e., single sky-position) searches in addition to all-sky searches. For a data time span of T=105 s, the all-sky two-detector DNN is about 7% less sensitive (in amplitude h0) at low frequency (f=20 Hz), and about 51% less sensitive at high frequency (f=1000 Hz) compared to fully-coherent matched-filtering (using weave). In the directed case the sensitivity gap compared to matched-filtering ranges from about 7%-14% at f=20 Hz to about 37%-49% at f=1500 Hz. Furthermore we assess the DNN's ability to generalize in signal frequency, spin down and sky-position, and we test its robustness to realistic data conditions, namely gaps in the data and using real LIGO detector noise. We find that the DNN performance is not adversely affected by gaps in the test data or by using a relatively undisturbed band of LIGO detector data instead of Gaussian noise. However, when using a more disturbed LIGO band for the tests, the DNN's detection performance is substantially degraded due to the increase in false alarms, as expected. © 2020 authors.
License of this version: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Document Type: Article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2020
Appears in Collections:An-Institute

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 37 53.62%
2 image of flag of United States United States 19 27.54%
3 image of flag of China China 7 10.14%
4 image of flag of Hong Kong Hong Kong 2 2.90%
5 image of flag of Taiwan Taiwan 1 1.45%
6 image of flag of Russian Federation Russian Federation 1 1.45%
7 image of flag of Netherlands Netherlands 1 1.45%
8 image of flag of Czech Republic Czech Republic 1 1.45%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse