Governance by Numbers: A Panopticon Reversed?

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Hamann, Julian: Governance by Numbers: A Panopticon Reversed? In: Politics and Governance 8 (2020), Nr. 2, S. 68-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2991

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/10343

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 121




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
This commentary is concerned with a specific form of power and discipline that is exerted through governance by numbers. Because of its many parallels to classical Foucauldian panopticism, governance based on numbers can be coined ‘numerocratic panopticism.’ Yet, going beyond similarities between classical and numerocratic panopticism, the commentary suggests three features specific to numerocratic panopticism that actually reverse characteristic traits of classical panopticism: In contrast to classical panopticism, numerocratic panopticism is multi-centered, non-spatial and open-purpose. Research on governance by numbers can benefit from a heuristic of panopticism if it considers both similarities and differences between classical and numerocratic panopticism.
License of this version: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Document Type: Article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2020
Appears in Collections:Forschungszentren

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 67 55.37%
2 image of flag of United States United States 22 18.18%
3 image of flag of China China 11 9.09%
4 image of flag of Indonesia Indonesia 4 3.31%
5 image of flag of Czech Republic Czech Republic 3 2.48%
6 image of flag of No geo information available No geo information available 2 1.65%
7 image of flag of Greece Greece 2 1.65%
8 image of flag of Switzerland Switzerland 2 1.65%
9 image of flag of Canada Canada 2 1.65%
10 image of flag of Japan Japan 1 0.83%
    other countries 5 4.13%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse