"Market withdrawals" of medicines in Germany after AMNOG: A comparison of HTA ratings and clinical guideline recommendations

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Staab, T.R.; Walter, M.; Mariotti Nesurini, S.; Dintsios, C.-M.; Schulenburg, J.-M. Graf von der et al.: "Market withdrawals" of medicines in Germany after AMNOG: A comparison of HTA ratings and clinical guideline recommendations. In: Health Economics Review 8 (2018), Nr. 1, 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0209-3

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/4247

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 558




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
Background: According to the AMNOG act, the German Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) determines the additional benefit of new medicines as a basis for subsequent price negotiations. Pharmaceutical companies may withdraw their medications from the market at any time during the process. This analysis aims to compare recommendations in clinical guidelines and HTA appraisals of medicines that were withdrawn from the German market since the introduction of AMNOG in 2011. Methods: Medications withdrawn from the German market between January 2011 and June 2016 following benefit assessment were categorized as opt-outs (max. 2weeks after start of price negotiations) or supply terminations (during or after further price negotiations). Related guidelines were systematically analyzed. For all withdrawals, therapeutic area, additional benefit rating and recommendation status in relevant clinical guidelines were assessed. Results: Among 139 medications, 10 opt-outs and 12 supply terminations were identified. Twenty-one out of 22 withdrawn medicines (95%) received 'no additional benefit' appraisal by the G-BA (average 'no additional benefit' rating for all AMNOG products: 47%). Of the 22 medicines, 15 (68%) were recommended by at least one guideline at the time of benefit assessment and 18 (82%) on 1 June 2016. Heterogeneity among guidelines was high. Acceptance of clinical trial endpoints was different between G-BA appraisals and clinical guidelines. Conclusion: Our analysis revealed considerable differences across clinical guidelines as well as between clinical guidelines and HTA appraisals of the medicines that were withdrawn from the German market. Better alignment of the clinical perspective and close collaboration between all involved parties is required to achieve and maintain optimization of patient care.
License of this version: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Document Type: Article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2018
Appears in Collections:Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of United States United States 222 39.78%
2 image of flag of Germany Germany 138 24.73%
3 image of flag of Sweden Sweden 49 8.78%
4 image of flag of Greece Greece 49 8.78%
5 image of flag of No geo information available No geo information available 19 3.41%
6 image of flag of Russian Federation Russian Federation 13 2.33%
7 image of flag of France France 7 1.25%
8 image of flag of South Africa South Africa 6 1.08%
9 image of flag of United Kingdom United Kingdom 6 1.08%
10 image of flag of China China 6 1.08%
    other countries 43 7.71%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse