Valtolina, S.; Shaifullah, G.; Samajdar, A.; Sesana, A.: Testing strengths, limitations, and biases of current pulsar timing arrays'detection analyses on realistic data. In: Astronomy and Astrophysics (A&A) 683 (2024), A201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348084
Abstract: | |
State-of-the-art searches for gravitational waves (GWs) in pulsar timing array (PTA) datasets model the signal as an isotropic, Gaussian, and stationary process described by a power law. In practice, none of these properties are expected to hold for an incoherent superposition of GWs generated by a cosmic ensemble of supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs). This stochastic signal is usually referred to as the GW background (GWB) and is expected to be the primary signal in the PTA band. We performed a systematic investigation of the performance of current search algorithms, using a simple power-law model to characterise GW signals in realistic datasets. We used, as the baseline dataset, synthetic realisations of timing residuals mimicking the European PTA (EPTA) second data release (DR2). Thus, we included in the dataset uneven time stamps, achromatic and chromatic red noise, and multi-frequency observations. We then injected timing residuals from an ideal isotropic, Gaussian, single power-law stochastic process and from a realistic population of SMBHBs, performing a methodical investigation of the recovered signal. We found that current search models are efficient at recovering the GW signal, but several biases can be identified due to the signal-template mismatch, which we identified via probability-probability (P- P) plots and quantified using Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) statistics. We discuss our findings in light of the signal observed in the EPTA DR2 and corroborate its consistency with a SMBHB origin. | |
License of this version: | CC BY 4.0 Unported |
Document Type: | Article |
Publishing status: | publishedVersion |
Issue Date: | 2024 |
Appears in Collections: | An-Institute |
pos. | country | downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
total | perc. | |||
1 | Germany | 2 | 66.67% | |
2 | United States | 1 | 33.33% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.