Toumi, M.; Dabbous, O.; Aballéa, S.; Drummond, M.F.; von der Schulenburg, J.-M.G. et al.: Recommendations for economic evaluations of cell and gene therapies: a systematic literature review with critical appraisal. In: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ERPO) 23 (2023), Nr. 5, S. 483-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2023.2197214
Abstract: | |
Objective: No consensus exists on the ideal methodology to evaluate the economic impact and value of new, potentially curative gene therapies. We aimed to identify and describe published methodologic recommendations for the economic evaluation of gene therapies and assess whether these recommendations have been applied in published evaluations. Methods: This study was conducted in three stages: a systematic literature review of methodologic recommendations for economic evaluation of gene therapies; an assessment of the appropriateness of recommendations; and a review to assess the degree to which the recommendations were applied in published evaluations. Results: A total of 2,888 references were screened, 83 articles were reviewed to assess eligibility, and 20 papers were included. Fifty recommendations were identified, and 21 reached consensus thresholds. Most evaluations were based on naive treatment comparisons and did not apply consensus recommendations. Innovative payment mechanisms for gene therapies were rarely considered. The only widely applied recommendations related to modeling choices and methods. Conclusions: Methodological recommendations for economic evaluations of gene therapies are generally not being followed. Assessing the applicability and impact of the recommendations from this study may facilitate the implementation of consensus recommendations in future evaluations. | |
License of this version: | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unported |
Document Type: | Article |
Publishing status: | publishedVersion |
Issue Date: | 2023 |
Appears in Collections: | Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät |
pos. | country | downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
total | perc. | |||
1 | Germany | 12 | 57.14% | |
2 | United States | 5 | 23.81% | |
3 | Ireland | 1 | 4.76% | |
4 | Indonesia | 1 | 4.76% | |
5 | United Kingdom | 1 | 4.76% | |
6 | Bulgaria | 1 | 4.76% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.