- Home
- →
- Fakultäten
- →
- Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät
- →
- View Item
Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):
Stüber, H.; Grabka, M.M.; Schnitzlein, D.D.: A tale of two data sets: comparing German administrative and survey data using wage inequality as an example. In: Journal for Labour Market Research = Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung (ZAF) 57 (2023), 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-023-00336-9
Repository version
Selected time period:
Sum total of downloads: 23
| Abstract: | |
The IAB’s Sample of Integrated Labour Market Biographies (SIAB) and the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) are the two data sets most commonly used to analyze wage inequality in Germany. While the SIAB is based on administrative reports by employers to the social security system, the SOEP is a survey data set in which respondents self-report their wages. Both data sources have their specific advantages and disadvantages. The objective of this study is to describe and compare the evolution of wage inequality for these two types of data. For this purpose, different sample restrictions are applied. The comparison without any harmonization of the data shows different levels and trends. When the information is largely harmonized, comparable trends and similar levels emerge. | |
| License of this version: | CC BY 4.0 Unported |
| Document Type: | Article |
| Publishing status: | publishedVersion |
| Issue Date: | 2023 |
| Appears in Collections: | Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät |
distribution of downloads over the selected time period:
downloads by country:
| pos. | country | downloads | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| total | perc. | |||
| 1 |  |
Germany | 9 | 39.13% |
| 2 |  |
United States | 8 | 34.78% |
| 3 |  |
Indonesia | 2 | 8.70% |
| 4 |  |
Ireland | 1 | 4.35% |
| 5 |  |
France | 1 | 4.35% |
| 6 |  |
Canada | 1 | 4.35% |
| 7 |  |
Austria | 1 | 4.35% |
Further download figures and rankings:
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.