Reydon, T.A.C.: The proper role of history in evolutionary explanations. In: Noûs 57 (2023), Nr. 1, S. 162-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12402
Abstract: | |
Evolutionary explanations are not only common in the biological sciences, but also widespread outside biology. But an account of how evolutionary explanations perform their explanatory work is still lacking. This paper develops such an account. I argue that available accounts of explanations in evolutionary science miss important parts of the role of history in evolutionary explanations. I argue that the historical part of evolutionary science should be taken as having genuine explanatory force, and that it provides how-possibly explanations sensu Dray. I propose an account of evolutionary explanations as comparative-composite explanations consisting of two distinct kinds of explanations, one processual and one historical, that are connected via the explanandum's evolvability to show how the explanandum is the product of its evolutionary past. The account is both a reconstruction of how evolutionary explanations in biology work and a guideline specifying what kind of explanations evolutionary research programs should develop. | |
License of this version: | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unported |
Document Type: | Article |
Publishing status: | publishedVersion |
Issue Date: | 2021 |
Appears in Collections: | Philosophische Fakultät |
pos. | country | downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
total | perc. | |||
1 | Germany | 19 | 42.22% | |
2 | United States | 11 | 24.44% | |
3 | Ukraine | 2 | 4.44% | |
4 | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | 4.44% | |
5 | Indonesia | 2 | 4.44% | |
6 | Russian Federation | 1 | 2.22% | |
7 | Serbia | 1 | 2.22% | |
8 | Netherlands | 1 | 2.22% | |
9 | Mexico | 1 | 2.22% | |
10 | Italy | 1 | 2.22% | |
other countries | 4 | 8.89% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.