Multi-level stakeholder engagement in flood risk management - A question of roles and power: Lessons from England

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/1891
dc.identifier.uri http://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/1916
dc.contributor.author Thaler, Thomas
dc.contributor.author Levin-Keitel, Meike
dc.date.accessioned 2017-09-14T08:57:51Z
dc.date.available 2018-02-01T23:05:23Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Thaler, T.; Levin-Keitel, M.: Multi-level stakeholder engagement in flood risk management - A question of roles and power: Lessons from England. In: Environmental Science and Policy 55 (2016), S. 292-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.007
dc.description.abstract In the past years, stakeholder engagement has become more important in flood risk management. On the one hand stakeholder engagement is often declared as a better way of management, a more successful way to reach consensus in policy discussions. On the other hand is the implementation of increasing stakeholder engagement far away from being as positive, where stakeholder engagement often ends in diverse difficulties and conflicts between political leaders and stakeholder groups. This paper aims to highlight participatory governance in flood risk management to provide an overview of the potential contributions and challenges of a participatory and collaborative governance approach. In this paper, we discuss the role of national authorities and local stakeholders in English flood risk management in three different examples (Bridgwater, Cockermouth and Morpeth). The results show that the Cockermouth and Morpeth flood risk management scheme is characterised by a high level of local self-responsibility in the planning and decision-making process. The study sites with high local capacity (Cockermouth and Morpeth) show a strong leadership at local level and bottom-up concepts and ideas. The local involvement in the discussion and decision-process depends on the local capacity (capacity to act), such as resources (knowledge, financial, time), interest, social and cultural capital. It strongly depends on these aspects, if localities are able to ensure their interests and needs at national level. eng
dc.description.sponsorship Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy (BMWFW)
dc.description.sponsorship French National Research Agency (ANR)
dc.description.sponsorship Ireland Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
dc.description.sponsorship Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
dc.description.sponsorship Middlesex University, London
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Amsterdam : Elsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofseries Environmental Science and Policy 55 (2016)
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0
dc.subject Flood risk management eng
dc.subject Partnership funding eng
dc.subject Power eng
dc.subject Societal implications eng
dc.subject Stakeholder engagement eng
dc.subject Article eng
dc.subject consensus eng
dc.subject decision making eng
dc.subject environmental planning eng
dc.subject financial management eng
dc.subject flooding eng
dc.subject funding eng
dc.subject knowledge eng
dc.subject leadership eng
dc.subject participatory management eng
dc.subject politics eng
dc.subject priority journal eng
dc.subject risk management eng
dc.subject time eng
dc.subject United Kingdom eng
dc.subject.ddc 710 | Landschaftsgestaltung, Raumplanung ger
dc.subject.ddc 650 | Management ger
dc.title Multi-level stakeholder engagement in flood risk management - A question of roles and power: Lessons from England
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.issn 14629011
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.007
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 55
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 292
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage 301
dc.description.version acceptedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken